Transcending Numerical Grading
Abstract
Much effort is expended by teachers in giving course grades to students. But, what does that grade, numeric or letter, represent in terms of learning? There are a number of factors that must be considered in doing a good evaluation and assigning a grade: (1) the pedagogical value of the evaluation process and method, (2) implementing a nonbiased, fair procedure based on students’ ability, English level and learning and (3) the effects of the evaluation beyond just testing and assigning a grade. This paper discusses these issues and suggests that a one-on-one evaluation method of oral proficiency assessment may have a much greater value beyond just testing/evaluation, in that it may enhance both the student’s and the teacher’s learning. This research focuses on the analysis of data collected from interviews of teachers and student questionnaires/feedback.