The Developing Portfolio

L08 6

Views: 180

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2008, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

This presentation explains the process of portfolio development for education majors/minors that is used at Luther College. The portfolio development is a phased process that begins in the first year. McLaughlin, Vogt, Anderson, DuMez, Peter and Hunter (1998) have described benefits such as greater student satisfaction with such a phased portfolio model. Students are first introduced to the portfolio process during their freshman January Term practicum course. Early in their course sequence, professors in the Educational Psychology and Diverse and Exceptional Learner courses highlight artifacts that represent the competencies. During Instructional Strategies course the students are taught how to write a rationale to link the artifact to the competencies. The students pay a modest sum for three years of service with Chalk and Wire, the electronic portfolio submission process selected by the Luther College education department, and they are trained in the use of this system. In the junior year, the semester before student teaching, the students present a “working portfolio.” The working portfolio has artifacts that represent each of the 10 competencies and are at the introductory or developing level. The students are assigned to a portfolio advisor who will stay with them through the working and professional presentations. During the working portfolio session, the student will explain the artifacts presented and the portfolio advisor will suggest any changes and recommend artifacts to collect for the professional level. The expectation is that all artifacts presented at the introductory or developing level will be replaced with artifacts representing the advanced level and taken from the student teaching semester. This developmental process has been the result of four years of continuous review and improvement. Students who have completed the portfolio process comment upon its usefulness and benefit in the interview process. There is satisfaction among the education department faculty because students are now consciously linking their coursework (and later their professional experiences) with the department competencies.