Exploring Measures of Engagement in Open Online Work Based Learning

183011467659863

Views: 222

  • Title: Exploring Measures of Engagement in Open Online Work Based Learning: Towards Better Measures of Success in Open Online Learning Methods, Massive or Otherwise
  • Author(s): Colin Gray
  • Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Collection: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Series: The Learner
  • Journal Title: The International Journal of Technologies in Learning
  • Keywords: Work-Based Learning, Online Learning, Student Engagement
  • Volume: 22
  • Issue: 3
  • Date: June 06, 2015
  • ISSN: 2327-0144 (Print)
  • ISSN: 2327-2686 (Online)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v22i03/49169
  • Citation: Gray, Colin. 2015. "Exploring Measures of Engagement in Open Online Work Based Learning: Towards Better Measures of Success in Open Online Learning Methods, Massive or Otherwise." The International Journal of Technologies in Learning 22 (3): 41-50. doi:10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v22i03/49169.
  • Extent: 10 pages

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2015, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

This paper details an investigation into methods for measuring engagement in open, online, work based learning (WBL). The aim of this research is to define a reliable measure of engagement which can be used to assess the success of WBL courses. This study was carried out within one WBL course, run with 6 cohorts of students. Learning analytics detailing student activity were collated and used to test the following measures of engagement: 1. Total volume of activity per day, 2. Total number of daily participants, 3. Categorising participants by total course activity. The results showed that measure 1 provided detailed trends, but was easily biased by the activity of a small number of participants. Measure 2 showed similar trends, but mitigated the bias present in method 1 and displayed a much lower margin for error. Measure 3 provided insight into engagement trends, but lacked detail and showed a large margin for error. It was found that measure 2 was the most reliable indicator of engagement, and thus of success on a course. This finding allows researchers to more reliably measure engagement in open, online WBL, and can inform similar research in the field of MOOCs.