Building a Collegiate Athletic Leadership Model for NCAA Teams

R12

Views: 294

  • Title: Building a Collegiate Athletic Leadership Model for NCAA Teams: Context, Leadership Behaviors, and Outcomes Mediated by Leader–Member Exchange Theory
  • Author(s): Neil Sinclair, Timothy Harper, Jeffrey Segrave
  • Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Collection: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Series: Sport & Society
  • Journal Title: The International Journal of Sport and Society
  • Keywords: Context, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Leader–Member Exchange, Team Performance Outcomes, Athletic Teams
  • Volume: 4
  • Issue: 2
  • Date: June 21, 2014
  • ISSN: 2152-7857 (Print)
  • ISSN: 2152-7865 (Online)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v04i02/53970
  • Citation: Sinclair, Neil, Timothy Harper, and Jeffrey Segrave. 2014. "Building a Collegiate Athletic Leadership Model for NCAA Teams: Context, Leadership Behaviors, and Outcomes Mediated by Leader–Member Exchange Theory." The International Journal of Sport and Society 4 (2): 33-46. doi:10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v04i02/53970.
  • Extent: 14 pages

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2014, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to address a gap in the extant literature regarding leadership theory in the context of athletics. Specifically, the paper proposes a conceptual leadership model, namely, the Collegiate Athletic Leadership Model (CALM) for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) teams. The model is formulated on the basis of a review of leadership theory literature. The CALM provides clarity on the interaction and range of transformational and transactional leadership behaviors that foster positive outcomes at the team and individual level, which has not been studied for NCAA teams at the Division I, II, or III levels. A review of the literature suggests that CALM behaviors are best placed in three tiers. The first tier is “foundation behaviors,” which are contingent reward, articulating a vision, fostering acceptance of group goals, and providing an appropriate role model. The second tier, “supporting behavior,” refers to individual consideration, which is most effective at the individual level of analysis. Intellectual stimulation and high performance expectations are the third tier, “developmental behaviors.” The categorization of the Foundational, Supporting, and Developmental tiers leads to the FSD model. Leader–member exchange (LMX) is posited as the mediating variable between the CALM behaviors and outcomes at the team and individual levels. The CALM is viewed in the context of NCAA Division I, II, and III academic institutions. These institutions are inherently complex, both in terms of organization, personnel, and goals. Future research should focus on NCAA teams and case studies, as well as empirical investigation of the tenets of the proposed models.