Aspirational and Attainable Lenses of Sustainability

Sustainability thumbnail

Views: 194

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2013, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

Blue Mountain Organic Vegetables (BMOV) is a not-for-profit organization in central Appalachia that coordinates the production and sales of organic fruit, vegetables and free-range eggs produced by farmers throughout the region. Many of the growers participating in BMOV are dependent on their farms for a large portion of their economic livelihoods. In 2008, the manager of a Wal-Mart retail store approached the not-for-profit’s board of directors with a proposal to sell BMOV’s produce at the store. Several members of BMOV’s board were outspoken in their opposition to the store when Wal-Mart’s corporate headquarters announced their decision to locate in the area. Board members opposed Wal-Mart’s impacts on regional land use and transportation patterns, labor practices and the additional competition the store would bring to locally-owned businesses. BMOV’s board members launched a prolonged debate about whether to partner with the retail giant. They excluded staff members and growers from this decision-making process. In 2009, the board decided against partnering with Wal-Mart. When staff members and growers found out about Wal-Mart’s proposal, and the board’s decision, they were angry at having been left out of the process. Moreover, they felt the board’s choice did not reflect BMOV’s mission and was not in the best interest of growers, staff members and the organization itself. This article explores the different perspectives regarding sustainability held by growers, staff and board members in BMOV and their implications for conflict management and decision making at the organizational scale, and for the Wal-Mart decision in particular. A fundamental tension that emerges from this exploration is the dichotomy of viewing sustainability through an aspirational or attainable lens. Leaders and decision makers in sustainability initiatives should be aware of the implications that their conceptualizations of sustainability can have on conflict and decision making in order to achieve higher levels of commitment, innovation and collaboration among participants.