Peer Review Reliability Improvements

Reviews are now saved more reliably. Previously, a server-side issue could silently cause review content to be permanently lost during a save. Saves now use a safer method that prevents this from happening.

Review assignments are no longer created before the review exists. Some students were seeing a "perform peer review" task that pointed to a review that didn't actually exist in the system. The review is now confirmed to be saved to the database before the assignment is recorded in the task.

Accessing an existing peer review is more reliable after page reload. Previously, reopening a peer review could fail if the page had been refreshed, because the system was checking temporary browser memory instead of the actual database. It now checks the database directly.

Students will now see a clear warning if a save fails. Previously, both manual saves and automatic background saves could fail without any visible indication. Students will now see an alert if a manual save fails, and a warning banner if automatic saving stops working.

Author feedback on peer reviews is saved immediately. When a work author submits their evaluation of a peer review they received, that feedback is now saved to the database right away rather than waiting for the next background save cycle.

Submitting a review no longer risks losing the final save. Previously, the system would navigate away from the editor at the same time it was trying to save, which could result in the save not completing. The navigation now waits for the save to finish.

Closing a review tab gives the save more time to complete. The system now checks whether the save is still in progress before removing the review tab, rather than relying on a fixed timer.

Stale "Access Peer Review" buttons are automatically cleaned up. If a review assignment points to a review that no longer exists, the system now removes the broken reference so the task reflects its actual state.

New Release Alpha 0.10.2