Abstract
This paper describes an empirical case from a reflection on how to systematize indicators when comparing territories-communities. The evaluation of communities draws upon different concept-drivers, such as quality of life, well-being, sustainability, development, resilience, among others. The inclusion of dimensions such as health and mental health, although they were gradually generated with the approaches of Georg Simmel, Talcott Parsons, Easterlin, Campbell, and others, has recently had a special consideration, especially with the associated concepts of happiness. On the other hand, the ecological footprint or carbon footprint have been the indicators that have gained ground in regional areas and to a lesser extent in municipalities due to the lack of aggregate data at smaller scales. Thus, the first part of this paper is to elucidate the currents through which indicator systems have been nurtured. Secondly, to describe and comment on different experiences based on their dimensions and number of indicators. Thirdly, to present a model and an empirical case of the Chilean reality with a system of indicators for sustainability. Finally, as a discussion, to reflect on the epistemological frameworks behind the selection of indicators and how subjective indicators need to materialize in order to find cultural diversity when comparing communities.
Presenters
Felipe Aníbal Gutiérrez-AntinopaiStudent, Ph.D student in Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, New York, United States
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
Economic, Social, and Cultural Context
KEYWORDS
INDICATORS, SYSTEMS, SUSTAINABILITY, EVALUATION, EXPERIENCES
