Abstract
This paper investigates the human rights violations that have occurred as a result of the global push for green energy, whilst questioning whether climate solutions can be achieved without sacrificing Indigenous lives. By analysing the historical and current relationship that Sweden, New Zealand, Australia and Canada have with their Indigenous Peoples, it explores recommendations for ethical conduct in future progress. A deeper investigation into other Indigenous Peoples complex circumstances is needed to move forward with truly sustainable development that considers the diversity in customary practices. Through a mixture of second-hand research, case studies and first-hand interviews with Indigenous Activists in Sweden, it has been possible to elicit the common experiences of oppression as well as the diversity in customary Indigenous practices around the world. Thus a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution is not suitable. Instead, the findings show that there needs to be a mixture of international and national legislation, education and awareness surrounding the historical and current oppression of Indigenous Rights, accountability from States for this oppression as well as their inaction in protecting Indigenous people from the impacts of climate change. Thus the ‘politics of indigeneity’ is explored as a concept for a new co-habitation between western nations and Indigenous Peoples, one that is rooted in sustainability. Lastly, we must neither view Indigenous Peoples as victims or as saviours. They are ultimately human beings who have the right to enjoy their own lives. But there is no doubt that the rest of the world can learn so much from them.
Presenters
Tanya HaldipurIndependent consultant, Recovery Community of Practice , Global Shelter Cluster, United Kingdom
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
KEYWORDS
ENVIRONMENT, INDIGENOUS, CLIMATE CHANGE, SUSTAINABILITY, LAND RIGHTS, DECOLONISATION, INDIGENEITY