Superposition of Quantum Linguistics in Literary Criticism Observing Harold Bloom’s Misprision of Noam Chomsky’s Literature-as-genetics: “When One Speaks a Language, One Knows a Great Deal that Was Never Learned”

Abstract

What we consider in this paper concerns literary criticism as entanglement operation arranged in superposition, a term derived from accumulated paleontology fossils arrayed in sedimentary rock, arranged by events in time preserved in stone. Superposition in quantum mechanics succinctly statistically supplies reality to an apparent Platonic illusion of a discrete integral object occurring in numerous other places simultaneously, not as reflected Newtonian optics, but as original function. Notably, Thomas Young’s 19th Century double slit discovery alleging the 20th Century Nils Bohr identification of wave-particle mechanics contemporaneously discerns quantum duality in Friedrich von Schiller’s 1801 essays “Off/On the Sublime,” essentially predicating David Chalmers’ 1995 “hard problem” of mind differentiating sensory experience from mental operation (the Sublime). John Keats as well contemporaneously comments in an 1815 letter: “Bards of Passion and of Mirth/Ye have left your souls on earth! / Have ye souls in heaven too, / Double-lived in regions new?” {Keats, J. Ode to the Poets, London 1814} stating the simulacrum of quantum mechanical research perspective. Said literary observations must be included in scientific field endeavor as Quantum Linguistic Criticism following Ervin Schrodinger’s 1944 scientific observations ‘What is Life?’ intended for Humanists.

Presenters

Richard H Goranowski
Legal Scholar, Litigation, Tarrantino, LLC, North Carolina, United States

Details

Presentation Type

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session

Theme

Communication

KEYWORDS

Natural Language, Syntax, Semantics, Clinamen, Illusion, Copenhagen Interpretation, Sublime

Digital Media

Downloads

Superposition of Quantum Linguistics in Literary Criticism (docx)

Superposition_of_Quantum_Linguistics_in_Literary_Criticism__1_.docx