Sixteenth International Conference on New Directions in the Humanities

Abstract

In the humanities, qualitative meta-synthesis studies are increasingly used to combine the findings of primary qualitative research. Noblit and Hare (1988) initially developed meta-ethnography as an interpretative synthesis approach. Subsequent qualitative synthesis approaches hold varying assumptions about the intent of syntheses (aggregative or interpretative) and their necessary methods. Contemporary approaches increasingly emphasize sophisticated methods to the detriment of the interpretive function. Although clear research steps could enhance rigor, overemphasis of such steps may inadvertently obscure the roles of researchers as interpretative agents. A close reading of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics revealed a position that researchers could assume to enhance the quality of qualitative meta-synthesis. As a philosophy of understanding, philosophical hermeneutics offers no method; however, it shares with meta-synthesis research the aspiration of new and deeper understanding. Philosophical hermeneutics considers understanding as interpretative, a dialogue between researcher and text. This dialogue plays with questions and answers in the metaphorical hermeneutic circle. It urges researchers to pay heed to their existing understandings and traditions that are conditions of and potential hindrances in interpretative understanding. This study proposes a combination of philosophical hermeneutic principles of understanding and rigorous methods that do not silence researchers as interpretative agents, to improve qualitative meta-synthesis studies.