Abstract
Generative AI brings new observations that are essential to new ways of knowing, new ways of finding the law. This paper concludes that among the changes wrought by generative AI, society and the legal community will shift their cognitive authority—the resources and techné that are trustworthy for determining what the law is. Movement in cognitive authority impacts the stability of law, which requires a certain permanence of content in the techné – medium or method – in which law is recorded and found. Permanence is an issue for generative AI. Furthermore, problems such as hallucination should give the legal community pause in accepting generative AI as authoritative. Nonetheless, the power of generative AI and for psychological reasons, generative AI will undoubtedly make its way into the legal community’s cognitive authority—hence, the shift. Hopefully, other research techné, including traditional print, will be utilized to check unbridled faith in generative AI platforms.
Presenters
Paul CallisterLibrary Director and Professor of Law, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, Missouri, United States Dana Neacsu
Librarian and Lecturer, Arthur W. Diamond Law Library, Columbia Law School, New York, United States
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
KEYWORDS
Generative AI, Large Language Models, Law, Cognitive Authority, Cognitive Drift
Digital Media
This presenter hasn’t added media.
Request media and follow this presentation.