Comment: Why do we need to evaluate what we do in education? How do we do it most effectively?
Make an Upate: Find an educational evaluation. Analyzes its strengths and weaknesses. Or, propose in outline form an educational evaulation that you would like to undertake.
Sunita Rani joined the community.
Hiba Ahmed Mohammed Khamis commented on an update Select and Supply Response Assessments (Admin Update 2).
Hiba Ahmed Mohammed Khamis commented on an update Learning Analytics: A Case Study of CGScholar (Admin Update 5).
Hiba Ahmed Mohammed Khamis commented on an update Standards-Based and Alternative Practices of Assessment (Admin Update 3).
Hiba Ahmed Mohammed Khamis commented on an update Intelligence Tests: The First Modern Assessments (Admin Update 1).
Hiba Ahmed Mohammed Khamis joined the community.
Samara Heringer joined the community.
William Cope
May Thet Khine Nyein
Obie Ellmoos.png "Nathan Luise")
Nathan Luise
Olive Sabiiti
we need to evaluate what we do in education because it is our role as educators or administrators to be tuned in to the reality of the impact of what we are doing.
we can
1. improve what we already have in motion
2. create new strategies and objectives based on what we see is lacking
3. identify gaps that need development
4. be in continuous contact with our stakeholders and their needs
5. adapt to the current realities - what we did 20 years ago does not always work today, what we did even 3 years ago does not always apply or work in the same way
we need to evaluate what we do in education because it is our role as educators or administrators to be tuned in to the reality of the impact of what we are doing.
we can
1. improve what we already have in motion
2. create new strategies and objectives based on what we see is lacking
3. identify gaps that need development
4. be in continuous contact with our stakeholders and their needs
5. adapt to the current realities - what we did 20 years ago does not always work today, what we did even 3 years ago does not always apply or work in the same way
we need to evaluate what we do in education because it is our role as educators or administrators to be tuned in to the reality of the impact of what we are doing.
we can
1. improve what we already have in motion
2. create new strategies and objectives based on what we see is lacking
3. identify gaps that need development
4. be in continuous contact with our stakeholders and their needs
5. adapt to the current realities - what we did 20 years ago does not always work today, what we did even 3 years ago does not always apply or work in the same way
Why do we need to evaluate what we do in education?
- Assessment helps identify strengths and weaknesses in teaching and learning methods, thereby improving curriculum and teaching methods.
- Assessment helps ensure that students achieve the necessary skills and knowledge according to established learning standards.
- Assessment provides timely and specific feedback to students, helping them recognize areas for improvement and build more effective learning plans.
- Data from assessments can support important decisions about educational policy, resource allocation, and curriculum improvement.
- Evaluation helps ensure that teachers and schools are accountable for the quality of education and the effectiveness of the teaching process.
So how to evaluate most effectively?
1. Combine many assessment methods to have a comprehensive view of students' abilities and progress.
2. Focus on using assessment to improve learning rather than just to test knowledge.
3. Make sure to design tests and assessment methods to be objective, not influenced by external factors such as gender, background, or economic status...
4. Provide detailed and timely feedback so students better understand what they did well and what needs improvement.
5. Increase the use of assessment support tools and software to collect, analyze and manage assessment data accurately and effectively.
6. Continuously improve programs and methods with the participation of all stakeholders such as experts, employers, parents, students, lecturers and educational administrators to ensure comprehensive evaluation and meaningful.
Summary: Assessment in education is an indispensable part of ensuring quality teaching and learning. To evaluate effectively, it is necessary to use diverse methods, ensure objectivity and fairness, provide timely feedback, and continuously improve evaluation methods based on actual results. In this way, we can support students in achieving their learning goals and improve the quality of their comprehensive education.
It is necessary to conduct evaluations in education in order to be able to monitor the progress of students. Grading at the same time creates motivation because this way students acquire more knowledge if they want to know for higher grades. The problem arises as to how to conduct quality assessments so that students have the motivation to acquire new knowledge, but also to receive quality feedback. You should pay attention to each student individually and see which method of evaluation would be most suitable.
Also analysing the results can help you to understand why some activities, approaches and digital tools work better than others, and take action to improve future lessons and materials.
It is vital to evaluate educational procedures and outcomes for multiple reasons:
Evaluating the efficacy of educational programs, interventions, and instructional methodologies is crucial in ascertaining their ability to accomplish the desired outcomes.
Accountability: To support resource allocation, guide decision-making, and guarantee accountability to children, parents, and the community, educational stakeholders—including educators, legislators, and funders—need proof of efficacy.
Ongoing Reflection, Refinement, and Innovation in Educational Practices are Facilitated by Continuous Improvement: Assessment offers input on what is functioning well and what requires enhancement.
These guidelines must be adhered to in order to carry out educational evaluations that are effective:
Clearly Define Objectives and Criteria: To guarantee alignment with the goal and context of the educational program or intervention, establish quantifiable, precise objectives, outcomes, and evaluation criteria.
Employ a Range of Data Sources and Techniques: To give a thorough picture of educational processes and outcomes, gather a range of qualitative and quantitative data from many sources, such as student assessments, surveys, interviews, observations, and administrative records.
A Program Evaluation of a Professional Development Initiative is an illustration of an educational evaluation.
Summary:
Introduction:
The professional development initiative's history and setting.
Purposes and objectives of the assessment.
Evaluation Design: Defining evaluation criteria and questions. choosing suitable data sources and assessment techniques (e.g., surveys, interviews, classroom observations). creation of protocols and data collection tools.
Data collection: Participants' pre- and post-program surveys are administered to gauge changes in their attitudes, knowledge, and abilities. interviewing administrators, facilitators, and program participants to obtain qualitative information on the success of the program, the integrity of its implementation, and the contexts that affect its results. Professional development sessions are observed in order to evaluate participant engagement, program delivery, and adherence to best practices.
Advantages:
A thorough method that combines quantitative and qualitative data to offer a comprehensive picture of the efficacy of the program.
Participation of stakeholders at every stage of the evaluation process to guarantee the findings' applicability, validity, and relevance.
Strict evaluation, design, and analysis techniques to yield trustworthy and useful findings.
Drawbacks:
A laborious and resource-intensive procedure that calls for proficiency with data analysis and evaluation techniques.
Possible biases or restrictions in the gathering and analysis of data, especially when it comes to observational and self-report data.
Difficulties extrapolating results outside of the particular framework of the professional development program.
It is vital to evaluate educational procedures and outcomes for multiple reasons:
Evaluating the efficacy of educational programs, interventions, and instructional methodologies is crucial in ascertaining their ability to accomplish the desired outcomes.
Accountability: To support resource allocation, guide decision-making, and guarantee accountability to children, parents, and the community, educational stakeholders—including educators, legislators, and funders—need proof of efficacy.
Ongoing Reflection, Refinement, and Innovation in Educational Practices are Facilitated by Continuous Improvement: Assessment offers input on what is functioning well and what requires enhancement.
These guidelines must be adhered to in order to carry out educational evaluations that are effective:
Clearly Define Objectives and Criteria: To guarantee alignment with the goal and context of the educational program or intervention, establish quantifiable, precise objectives, outcomes, and evaluation criteria.
Employ a Range of Data Sources and Techniques: To give a thorough picture of educational processes and outcomes, gather a range of qualitative and quantitative data from many sources, such as student assessments, surveys, interviews, observations, and administrative records.
A Program Evaluation of a Professional Development Initiative is an illustration of an educational evaluation.
Summary:
Introduction:
The professional development initiative's history and setting.
Purposes and objectives of the assessment.
Evaluation Design: Defining evaluation criteria and questions. choosing suitable data sources and assessment techniques (e.g., surveys, interviews, classroom observations). creation of protocols and data collection tools.
Data collection: Participants' pre- and post-program surveys are administered to gauge changes in their attitudes, knowledge, and abilities. interviewing administrators, facilitators, and program participants to obtain qualitative information on the success of the program, the integrity of its implementation, and the contexts that affect its results. Professional development sessions are observed in order to evaluate participant engagement, program delivery, and adherence to best practices.
Advantages:
A thorough method that combines quantitative and qualitative data to offer a comprehensive picture of the efficacy of the program.
Participation of stakeholders at every stage of the evaluation process to guarantee the findings' applicability, validity, and relevance.
Strict evaluation, design, and analysis techniques to yield trustworthy and useful findings.
Drawbacks:
A laborious and resource-intensive procedure that calls for proficiency with data analysis and evaluation techniques.
Possible biases or restrictions in the gathering and analysis of data, especially when it comes to observational and self-report data.
Difficulties extrapolating results outside of the particular framework of the professional development program.
Why do we evaluate and how do we do it effectively?
In education we need to evaluate our programs in order to make judgments about the quality of particular interventions to determine how they improve “the context, processes, or outcomes of people’s lives” and to guide future programs.
We can do this most effectively through addressing the challenges and tensions inherent in the practice of evaluation (how good is the evaluation) and evaluating the evaluators. Evaluations can follow program evaluation standards for practice including meta-evaluation. Evaluators can follow specific competencies or engage in credentialing (which the lecturer states is a rare event).
This educational evaluation was of an early childhood literacy model. The results were that increased adherence to the program model was not associated with more positive outcomes for individual learners. This is interesting to me for a couple of reasons. The first reason is how often you hear about results being dependent on following the program closely. The other reason was that my dissertation was on early literacy and the impact of an administrator’s involvement in the implementation–which in my research was highly correlated to the success of the program as judged by learner outcomes. In this study, the highest and lowest rates of literacy growth were concentrated in several low-implementing sites. I am left with the question, “What did the sites that had the highest rate of literacy growth do instead of the implementation of this program?” and “Were there socioeconomic differences that were not controlled?”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1098214007301138
Why do we evaluate and how do we do it effectively?
In education we need to evaluate our programs in order to make judgments about the quality of particular interventions to determine how they improve “the context, processes, or outcomes of people’s lives” and to guide future programs.
We can do this most effectively through addressing the challenges and tensions inherent in the practice of evaluation (how good is the evaluation) and evaluating the evaluators. Evaluations can follow program evaluation standards for practice including meta-evaluation. Evaluators can follow specific competencies or engage in credentialing (which the lecturer states is a rare event).
This educational evaluation was of an early childhood literacy model. The results were that increased adherence to the program model was not associated with more positive outcomes for individual learners. This is interesting to me for a couple of reasons. The first reason is how often you hear about results being dependent on following the program closely. The other reason was that my dissertation was on early literacy and the impact of an administrator’s involvement in the implementation–which in my research was highly correlated to the success of the program as judged by learner outcomes. In this study, the highest and lowest rates of literacy growth were concentrated in several low-implementing sites. I am left with the question, “What did the sites that had the highest rate of literacy growth do instead of the implementation of this program?” and “Were there socioeconomic differences that were not controlled?”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1098214007301138
Ensuring excellence in education requires continuous reflection and evaluation of our practices. It's not merely about meeting standards but about ensuring that the resources invested in education genuinely benefit our students. We must constantly question the effectiveness of our strategies in helping students reach their full potential. Evaluation serves as a mirror reflecting the value of our educational efforts, guiding us to stay on track with our goals.
In conducting evaluations, a balanced approach is crucial. It's not just about numbers; it's about the narratives behind them. Integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods, and involving various stakeholders, ensures a comprehensive understanding of the educational landscape. Continuous assessment provides real-time feedback for meaningful improvements, akin to having a GPS for the educational journey.
However, with the power of evaluative data comes responsibility. We must handle data ethically, respecting the privacy and rights of every individual in the educational community. Upholding ethical standards fosters trust and integrity, creating an environment where students can thrive confidently.