Thirteenth International Conference on The Inclusive Museum

Abstract

To interpret material culture is more effectively, usually at a living museum; to test an archaeological thesis or to participate in an enjoyable recreational activity that is also a learning experience. The interpretation of the past for a public audience is not as simple as “emotional journeying” or “illusion”. In fact it is embroiled in issues that museums and the wider field of archaeology also face—those of authenticity, authority, and reflexivity. Reenactors are largely outside of the academic sphere, however, their responses to these issues provide a unique perspective. For most practitioners, there are two essential elements to living history: the pursuit of what is referred to as authenticity and the claim to be making history accessible. The present meets the past with a focus on the quest, modern man using science, technology, his imagination and adventure some spirit to put himself in his ancestor’s place and experience it. It has the advantage of placing scholar and visitor together, sharing the same curiosity and evaluating the answers that result when modern man tries to simulate life in another time. For the museum visitor of the living history, reenactment programs, those objects – formerly only viewable through vitrine – are seen in action, feeing them from their status as static relics. The use of artifacts lends the whole experience an air of authenticity. It is an effective way to engage the public with an aspect of the history that would be difficult to convey within the confines of an interior space.