Nineteenth International Conference on Environmental, Cultural, Economic & Social Sustainability

Abstract

I commend accommodating environmentally friendly architectural designs that are extremely common/usual whose features make it a sustainable space. The society we are dealing with has a keen interest in scrutinizing and analyzing the necessitous lives of their inhabitants. The main difference which can be highlighted is the energy or cost per year of how much a person expands on the maintenance of their surroundings and sustains the system after recognizing the related environmental issues. In this paper, the natural and artificial build visual is being proposed in such a way that deals with environmental, ecological and economic criteria. Moreover, the criteria against ecology-environment-economics reflect in the sustainable inputs which sustain the systems in the natural and artificial built environment. The environmental services are provided used as units of production side by side, resulting in local job creation and saving resources, for instance, conservation of rainwater, soil formation or protection, less energy consumption to achieve Net Zero, and a stable climate as a whole. Once used, the compost wastage or the natural inputs pass out of the economy as pollution and waste. Hence, the potential of an environment to provide services and materials is the environmental function. As result, it is depleted as the resources are either consumed or the pollution contaminates the resources.