Abstract
This proposal examines the evolution of policy analysis from rational choice and policy cycles to a focus on conceptual construction and argumentation. Central to this transformation is the understanding that policy-making is shaped by conceptual frameworks or narratives, which provide the structure and meaning for policy actions. Influenced by the works of Maarten A. Hajer, Frank Fischer, Emery Roe, and Deborah Stone, this research adopts a poststructuralist view that language creates reality. The researcher argues for the application of Derridean deconstruction to challenge and reframe existing policy narratives, thus eliminating binary oppositions and fostering the development of more organic and spontaneous policies. The methodology combines Critical Discourse Analysis with qualitative approaches such as Ruth Wodak’s Historical approach and Paul Gee’s methods. The research also incorporates an interactive, diachronic, and synchronic analysis, with the potential use of Chaos theory to explain complex outcomes. The findings aim to contribute to a more nuanced and adaptable approach to policy-making, addressing contemporary societal needs.
Presenters
Narjes ZeinolabedinResearcher, Science Policy, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
KEYWORDS
Narrative Frameworks, Poststructuralism, Derridean Deconstruction, Critical Discourse Analysis, STS
