Abstract
This paper examines the existing heuristics in aviation - specifically juxtaposing human problem solving faced with the intervention of AI and computer automation. While seemingly the two have been conditioned over the last century to nourish one another, in instances where problem solving exists outside of “normal work flows,” how can each, human and automated logic, complement each other? And pressingly, what is called upon human intervention when automation presents error? This conundrum is examined, discussed, and suggested resolve by looking at flight AF447 as a cautionary tale, and cross-discipline denouement of what we as humans must consider in terms of critical thinking and problem solving in spaces (like aviation) that are increasingly becoming more dependent on artificial intelligence and automation. This paper details the history of crew resource management and collaboration as the ultimate tool in verifying the validity of technological guidance, and asks educators (or anyone observing the dialogue) to consider their own agency in problem solving as technological dependence surrounds the human experience.
Presenters
Hannah WilliamsStudent, Ph.D. Educational Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
KEYWORDS
Collaborative Learning, Automation, Artificial Intelligence, Work Flows, Problem Solving, Humanities
Digital Media
This presenter hasn’t added media.
Request media and follow this presentation.