Separated at the Border: Some Administrative and Human Rights Consequences of the Unprecedented Family Separation Migration Policy

Abstract

In June 2018, the US government introduced the migration policy of separation of the minors from their adult relatives just after apprehension at the border. Even if the family separation was practiced in the past, this has not been used as a punitive instrument to discourage immigrants and potential refugees to come to the US. The deliberate “zero-tolerance” strategy has already led to the separation of over 6,000 families in a four-month period. The process of family separation would have long-lasting effects not only for the separated families but also for the receiving US society in general. This paper explores some of the consequences of the forcible separation of children from their parents seeking asylum in the United States. Firstly, the paper makes an attempt at understanding the administrative disruptions and pressures, glitches and, sometimes, pure chaos in the federal institutions involved in the protection of the children separated from the asylum-seeking parents. Secondly, the paper analyzes the multiple violations of the children’s’ rights - especially those stated in the Florens Settlement. - and, also, the moral implications for a nation often proud to offer shelter for the victims of persecution from all corners of the world.

Details

Presentation Type

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session

Theme

Society and Culture

KEYWORDS

International, Migration, Refugees, Minors, Globalization

Digital Media

This presenter hasn’t added media.
Request media and follow this presentation.