Critical Findings of the Sixth Assessment Report of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: A Summary for Policymakers Analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess how the intergovernmental panel on climate change’s (IPCC’s) sixth assessment report of Working Group I (WGI), a Summary for Policymakers (SPM), has evaluated the current climate change situation. The author uses the qualitative content analysis (QCA) method (i.e. summative content analysis [SCA]) to identify critical points of the SPM. To better understand the WGI report and its SPM, the author uses the thematic analysis, often called the QCA method. This study takes more steps and uses one of the main qualitative content analysis approaches (i.e. SCA). Therefore, QCA (SCA) can help the author count the occurrence of certain words using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software that quantifies the words in the data. This process helps the author to understand codes and patterns (e.g. the concept in the results section). Findings Interestingly, the AR6 says more about adaptation for policymakers in sections C (Climate information for risk assessment) and D (Mitigation of future climate change) than in sections A and D. Finally, this study concludes that the IPCC WGI SPM has addressed evidence on global climate change policymaking for SPMa, SPMd (mitigation-based strategies and mitigation policy [MP]) and SPMb, SPMc (adaptation policy and adaptation-based strategy).

Presenters

Majid Asadnabizadeh
Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Political Science and Administration. International Relations Department, UMCS, Poland

Details

Presentation Type

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session

Theme

Technical, Political, and Social Responses

KEYWORDS

IPCC, GCCPM, SPM, Adaptation, Mitigation

Digital Media

This presenter hasn’t added media.
Request media and follow this presentation.