Produced with Scholar
Icon for Positive Impact Project: Argumentative Writing & Presentation

Positive Impact Project: Argumentative Writing & Presentation

Learning Module

1. Unit Introduction

Teacher Content

The purpose of this project is to engage students in meaningful research, discourse, and publication of argumentative writing that centers on a topic of their choice. The project prompt is: What person, organization, or event has had a significant lasting impact on the world? This prompt is deliberately vague, as to allow students to, wherever possible, persue a topic about which they are passionate and knowledgeable. 

This unit was designed with sixth graders in mind in an ELA classroom. The lessons are written for students whose skills are at grade-level, but options are provided throughout for extension and scaffolding depending on student needs. The unit is meant to take place over roughly 20 school days, with some updates taking a few days and some taking only a class period. Instructor discretion as to pacing will be important.

Pre-requisite Skills:​

  • Basic understanding of paragraph structure
  • Knowledge of internet search-limiting parameters (site: searches and use of quotation marks, etc.)

Common Core Standards Addressed Formally or Informally:

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.1 - Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.3 - Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.3.A - Vary sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.6.3.B - Maintain consistency in style and tone.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.1 - Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.2 - Determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.3 - Analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes).
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.5 - Analyze how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.6 - Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.7 - Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6.1 - Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6.4 - Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6.5 - Include multimedia components (e.g., graphics, images, music, sound) and visual displays in presentations to clarify information.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6.6 - Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks, demonstrating command of formal English when indicated or appropriate.

On the teacher side of each update, suggestions for differentiation for levels of learners are suggested, as well as links to supplementary resources for small-group instruction or alternate activities.

For this update, students are asked to consider what it means to have a "positive impact" and practice participating in online discussions with peers. Be present in the discussion, demonstrating the principles of "netiquette" yourself and guiding students toward respectful, thoughtful, and constructive discussions.

Student Content

Welcome to the Positive Impact Project! Over the next few weeks, you will be creating a published argument about the value of a person, organization, or event that has posively impacted the world. By the end of Update 3, you will need to choose your project focus, and by the end of Update 4, you will choose your project format for the final submission. 

Over the course of this unit, you will:

  • collaborate with peers to refine and revise ideas about their projects and your own.
  • develop an understanding of argumentative vocabulary, including ethos, pathos, logos, audience, target audience, claim, counterclaim, thesis, and credibility.
  • review the major parts of formal writing, including introduction, supporting reasons, text evidence, justification, refutation, and conclusion.
  • research your topic of choice, curating an annotated bibliography of resources about the impact of your topic.
  • create and publish an argument about the value of your topic's impact on the world.

Let's get started! 

For this update, we're simply going to start thinking in the direction of positive impact. Create an update about what you think it means for someone/thing to have a "positive impact" on the world. Consider, for example, whether or not the person or event needs to be positive throughout or if the results and changes caused by the person or event is enough to nominate them for a positive impact project spot. Review the updates of at least two classmates and comment with constructive feedback - see the infographic below for reminders about how to conduct yourself in online discussions!

 

2. Rhetorical Devices

Teacher Content

In this update, students review (or are introduced to) the concept of rhetorical devices. After participating in off-line conversations about examples of ethos, pathos, and logos, students will create an update regarding the use of the rhetorical devices in a sample essay.

CCSS Addressed: 

  • RI.6.4 - Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings.
  • RI.6.5 - Analyze how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas.

For Struggling Learners:

  • EL students, in particular, may struggle with the figurative language that creates effective pathos (emotional appeal). In the video activity, consider pulling those students into a small group to focus on the images and music that accompany the pathos example to help connect the words to the emotion.
  • Additionally, it may be helpful to do a game-style sorting activity with students who are struggling. Provide short examples of ethos, pathos, and logos and have students work collaboratively to sort them into the correct rhetorical devices. These scenario cards are already created and will work! (No, I didn't create them)

For Excelling Students:

  • Instead of simply asking these students to identify the rhetorical appeal in the video, have them rank their effectiveness.  Which video/appeal combination was the most persuasive? Why was it more effective than others?

 


Student Content

Before we can start our individual projects, we all need to have a baseline understanding of the vocabulary and concepts that create the foundation of argumentative writing and research. This update focuses on the three major rhetorical appeals.

By the end of this update, you should be able to:

  • define ethos, pathos, and logos
  • identify examples of any of the three rhetorical appeals in video, media, or writing
  • justify your choice of a rhetorical device using examples from the sample work

Rhetorical Devices

Rhetorical devices are different ways to convince an audience of a side of an argument. We will be focusing on three (3) common rhetorical devices throughout this unit.

​As the graphic above demonstrates, the different rhetorical devices are ethos, pathos, and logos.

  • Ethos - an author tries to make him or herself seem credible or reliable to convince the audience of the argument. The focus is on the person presenting the argument.
  • Logos - an author uses logic, facts, or numbers to convince the audience of his or her argument. The focus is on the facts and research in the argument.
  • Pathos - an author uses emotion or feelings to convince the audience of his or her argument. The focus is on the emotion of the audience.

Here's a video that explains the rhetorical appeals again, just in case you need it! 

Media embedded February 16, 2019

 

Small Group Activity

With your assigned group, review the videos and resources below. Identify for each example that you've been assigned whether you believe it is an example of ethos, logos, pathos, or some combination of the three. Review with your teacher for any you're unsure about and comment on this update with your group's answers. 

  1. Quit Smoking Commercial
  2. Stay Extraordinary 
  3. Wal-Mart
  4. What on Earth
  5. Nationwide Jingle Sessions
  6. Tesla
  7. Hamilton

Your Update

Now that you've got a handle on ethos, pathos, and logos, let's see it in action. Read the essay linked here. In your update, explain which rhetorical appeal you think is used most strongly in the essay. Provide examples from the text to support your answer. Respond to at least two classmate's answers, paying attention to those who disagree. Discuss whether both appeals may be present, and consider why one person might have thought another appeal was stronger.

3. Formatting Arguments

Teacher Content

In this update, students will be reviewing the terminology of argument writing and revisiting the essay used in Update 2. Students will be asked to evaluate the writing piece, and, in their update, explain the final score given to the writing piece. This is written as an independent activity, but it could easily become a partner or small group activity to suit student needs.

The evaluation uses a fixed grading scale, as indicated at the top of the student work document, which could also be adjusted. For reference, the grading scale used assumes that an 81 is "task mastery," meaning grade-level expectations have been met. Scores higher than an 81 indicate that grade-level expectations have been exceeded.

Students will also need to fill out the survey included in this update to indicate what person, organization, or event they will research for their Positive Impact Project.

CCSS Addressed:

  • RI.6.1 - Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RI.6.5 - Analyze how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas.
  • RI.6.8 - Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
  • W.6.1 - Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
  • W.6.1.A - Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
  • W.6.1.B - Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
  • W.6.1.C - Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons.

For Struggling Learners:

  • As mentioned above, consider strategically grouping students to faciliate discussion and success with the scoring activity.
  • The student work document could also be simplified or the text switched out depending on student level of independence with reading and writing. Consider using this Letter to the Editor if a simpler text is required.

For Excelling Students:

  • Instead of filling out the recommendations at the end of the student work document, ask these students to "make it an A." This would be an excellent collaborative opportunity for students whose argument skills are strong but may need work on writing or collaboration.

Student Content

How an argument is developed matters. We learned in the last update that rhetorical appeals can be powerful persuasive tools, but these tools don't work if the argument itself isn't set up logically. 

In this update, you will:

  • review the terminology associated with argumentative writing. 
  • analyze a piece of argumentative writing.
  • submit your topic choice for your Positive Impact Project

Terminology Review

Fill in the organizer attached here, matching the terms to the definitions provided. THEN, read the essay linked here and include an example of each of the terms in the box at the right. Include a direct quote from the essay. See your teacher with questions and to check your answers!

Your Update

​Using the same essay, complete as much of the evaluation checklist linked here as is necessary to score the essay. Use only the rubric scores provided, keeping in mind that an 81 is the mastery threshold for "meets grade-level expectations." Once you've come to a final score, create an update with your score, an explanation of why that score is what you landed on, and a list of no fewer than 2 suggestions for improvement. Respond to at least 2 classmates' updates, 1 classmate who gave a higher score and 1 who gave a lower score. In your comment, try to convince them to consider your score as more appropriate or, if their reasoning is sound, explain how they convinced you that their score is more appropriate.

 

If you're truly stumped for what to choose for your project, see the list linked here. (The point, though, is for you to choose something you care about and are interested in.) Complete the survey attached to this update when you've chosen.

4. Annotated Bibliography

Teacher Content

This update will take students multiple days to complete. Depending on student success, the instructor will want to start with a five-day goal and adjust from there.

Project topics must be submitted and approved before the annotated bibliography can be completed. Meet with students who have not submitted topics or whose topics aren't acceptable to come up with a suitable research topic before moving into the update.

By the time students have completed this update, they should be able to explain the purpose and value of an annotated bibliography and create an annotated bibliography with resources about their chosen PIP topic. The annotated bibliography will help focus student work later on, so it is important that it is filled with resources that cover many aspects of their topic. The recommendations in this update for resources are based on the availability within the author's district; adjustments may need to be made depending on what students have access to in your district.

CCSS Addressed:

  • RI.6.1 - Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RI.6.5 - Analyze how a particular sentence, paragraph, chapter, or section fits into the overall structure of a text and contributes to the development of the ideas.
  • RI.6.8 - Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
  • W.6.1 - Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
  • W.6.1.A - Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
  • W.6.1.B - Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
  • W.6.1.C - Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons.

For Struggling Learners:

  • Students may need curated resource lists to start from or small-group tutorials on how to research online.
  • Consider adjusting the minimum number of sources for individual students whose topics or abilities aren't up to the 12 recommended in the update.
  • Be available for students as this process continues. Individual needs will vary greatly depending on topic, and one-on-one check-ins are recommended throughout the update to ensure student success.

For Excelling Students:

  • Consider allowing students who finish early or who are efficient in their research to become "credibility experts," or people to whom other students can go to get a second opinion on a source.

Student Content

Now that you have a topic for your Positive Impact Project, the next step is gathering resources! In this update, you will:

  • learn about the purpose and format of annotated bibliographies.
  • review how to determine whether or not a source is credible.
  • review how to set up a project in Noodletools (and actually do that).
  • create and submit an annotated bibliography about your PIP topic!

First, what's an annotated bibliography? 

Media embedded February 17, 2019

Simply put, an annotated bibliography is a list of sources of information about a topic with citations and notes about the source and its crediblity and/or usefulness. This resource also provides some useful information about annotated bibliographies. 

Now that you know what an annotated bibliography is, let's review how to create one using the tools you have access to through your school account.

We will be using Noodletools to set up and organize our annotated bibliography. You can access this resource through our Media Center homepage.

The video below will walk you through setting up your Noodletools project and how to create citations and notecards. Review it carefully! It will be helpful! (It may actually be a good idea to split your screen and have Noodletools open while the tutorial plays.)

Noodletools Video

There's one final piece of the puzzle before you're unleashed on the world of research! How will you know if your sources are reliable? For any non-database source you use, you will be required to provide a credibility score based on the worksheet linked here

​Now you're ready to research!

Your annotated bibliography should include:

  • a minimum of 12 sources
  • at least 2 database sources (use the Media Center homepage) unless you have a one-on-one with your teacher where it's decided that won't work for your topic
  • properly formatted MLA citations for every source
  • an annotation for every source that includes a summary of the source (limit this to no more than 4 sentences), an explanation of its credibility (with a score for any non-database sites), and a statement of its potential for use in your project.

Once you've done all of that in Noodletools, you will export the bibliography from Noodletools into your Google Drive.

Your Update

​Once you've exported your bibliography, you should include a link to the Google Doc in your update. Additionally, copy out your least credible source's complete citation and annotation into your update. Comment on at least 3 other student's updates by:

  • Reviewing the annotation for their weakest source
  • Reviewing the source itself
  • Offering a suggestion as to whether or not you believe the source should be included in their final project with at least two reasons why or why not

5. Audience

Teacher Content

In this update, students will review (or learn) the terminology surrounding audience and determine the appropriate audience for their PIP topic. At the end of this update, students will also choose the format that their final project will take, which may include:

  • Google Site
  • Powtoon
  • Video
  • Google Slides with Live Presentation
  • Commercial
  • Poster
  • Newspaper article
  • Award Introduction Speech
  • Museum Exhibit
  • Other - with teacher approval only

Build in time to conference with students regarding their choices to make sure they understand what's expected and have the technology skills to create their chosen product.

Additionally, monitor student comments about the target audience for the Paw Patrol commercial. This may help identify students who don't quite grasp the target audience concept, allowing for small-group instruction to help correct misconceptions.

CCSS Addressed:

  • SL.6.1.C - Pose and respond to specific questions with elaboration and detail by making comments that contribute to the topic, text, or issue under discussion.
  • W.6.4 - Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

For Struggling Learners:

  • Consider using the following tutorial with students who struggle to differentiate between audience and target audience. WriteAbout.Com - Audience & Purpose Lesson
  • For students truly struggling with the target audience for their project, consider providing an appropriate target audience so that students can accurately tailor content. Being told their audience doesn't mean they aren't practicing the skill of writing for one. :-)

For Excelling Students:

  • If a target audience has been selected appropriately, consider having these students craft (and send) invitations to individuals outside of the classroom who are part of the target. This will help these students develop more professional communication skills as well as adding another layer of authenticity to the project.

Student Content

In this update, you will focus on developing an appropriate audience for your Positive Impact Project. By the end of this update, you will also conference with your teacher to determine your final project's format.

By the end of this update, you should be able to:

  • distinguish between "audience" and "target audience"
  • identify the audience and target audience for your project
  • determine your final project product

What is an audience?

The audience is the total group of people who experience a publication, whether it's a speech, a video, a poster, or something else entirely. While every audience member is important, when we're creating something persuasive, we're not trying to convince every member of the audience. 

In order for a publication to be successful, the creator needs to focus on the correct target audience. The target audience is the part of the audience that the creator is hoping to persuade to act according to their wishes; they're the people you're trying to reach with your publication. 

For example, let's take a look at an advertisement.

Media embedded February 17, 2019

The audience for this commercial is anyone who sees the commercial. But not everyone who sees the commercial a) knows about Paw Patrol, b) wants to play with Paw Patrol toys, or c) has access to the purchasing power to get the toy.

Who then, is the target audience for this commercial? Comment on this update with your guess and at least one reason why. Your teacher may choose to have a class discussion based on the results, so be sure to participate! 

Conference with your teacher about your project product before creating your update!

Your Update

Create an update that includes all of the following:

  • Your project topic
  • Your project product
  • Your audience
  • Your target audience
  • An explanation of why and how you chose that target audience.

Comment on at least two classmates' updates offering feedback on whether or not the target audience seems appropriate to their chosen topic and product. Remember your netiquette in your responses!

6. Introduction

Teacher Content

From this point forward, this unit focuses on students working on the individual components of their projects. Therefore, the instructions are deliberately broad, to allow for the wide range of project topics and product selections. The instructor's role through the remainder of the updates will be to conference with students regularly to ensure success throughout the process and monitor student conversations in class and on the platform to facilitate positive and constructive communication.

The pacing of the next few updates will vary widely by students, so consider posting 6-8 together to allow students to work at the pace appropriate for them.

This update focuses on developing an effective introduction to the topic with the target audience in mind.

CCSS Addressed: 

  • W.6.1 - Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
  • W.6.1.A - Introduce claim(s) and organize the reasons and evidence clearly.
  • W.6.4 - Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

For Struggling Learners:

  • Consider strategically placing students with similar topics near each other to allow for conversation that may help clarify thinking and progress.
  • For individuals who are struggling, make time to conference regularly to monitor progress and potentially make changes to requirements to help students succeed. 

For Excelling Students:

  • Students can accellerate through Updates 6-8 at their own pace. 
  • Consider having students who are moving quickly (AND doing well) become "texperts" (experts on a particular tech tool) or "product managers" (sounding boards for other students about a particular product choice). 

Student Content

In this update, you will:

  • learn ways to "hook" an audience
  • review tips for focusing on engaging your target audience
  • create the introduction for your final PIP product

What's a Hook?

Hooks are ways that a content creator can drawn in members of the audience to their publication. Review any of the following resources for some background on how this can be done:

Media embedded February 17, 2019
Media embedded February 17, 2019

Engaging Your Target Audience

A good hook is developed with the target audience in mind. Take a look at the example below. Comment on the update with the following:

  • What hook technique was used?
  • Who is the target audience?
  • Does that combination work?
Media embedded February 17, 2019

Now you can work on the hook or introduction for your project! Feel free to seek out feedback from peers and from your teacher as you're working. Always keep your target audience in mind!

Your Update

In your update, you should include either the text or a screenshot of your introduction to your product. Comment on at least three classmates' updates with feedback on the introduction. Remember your netiquette, both in your comments and as the creator. Not everyone who comments will be in your target audience, but the feedback is valuable! Use it to refine and improve your introduction before moving on to Update 7.

7. Content

Teacher Content

From Update 6 forward, this unit focuses on students working on the individual components of their projects. Therefore, the instructions are deliberately broad, to allow for the wide range of project topics and product selections. The instructor's role through the remainder of the updates will be to conference with students regularly to ensure success throughout the process and monitor student conversations in class and on the platform to facilitate positive and constructive communication.

The pacing of the next few updates will vary widely by students, so consider posting 6-8 together to allow students to work at the pace appropriate for them.

This update focuses on developing effective content on the topic with the target audience in mind.

CCSS Addressed:

  • W.6.1 - Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
  • W.6.1.B - Support claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text.
  • W.6.1.C - Use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationships among claim(s) and reasons.
  • W.6.4 - Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

For Struggling Learners:

  • Consider strategically placing students with similar topics near each other to allow for conversation that may help clarify thinking and progress.
  • For individuals who are struggling, make time to conference regularly to monitor progress and potentially make changes to requirements to help students succeed.
  • When developing content, consider providing struggling writers with graphic organizers (I like this one) appropriate to student level and topic.

For Excelling Students:

  • ​Students can accellerate through Updates 6-8 at their own pace.
  • Consider having students who are moving quickly (AND doing well) become "texperts" (experts on a particular tech tool) or "product managers" (sounding boards for other students about a particular product choice).
  • Students whose argument skills are strong may also be useful as interim peer reviewers during this update. Consider providing a persuasion map (like above) as a peer review tool.

Student Content

In this update, you will: 

  • review the definition for "counter-claim" and develop four counter-claims for your own topic
  • review the important elements of an argument to include in your own work
  • integrate presentation tips into the content of your argument
  • create and submit your content portion of your project

What is a counter-claim?

A counter-claim is a claim that opposes a central claim. This does not necessarily mean they are opposites. For example, if a claim is that recess should be 45 minutes, a counter claim might be that recess should remain 30 minutes. It also could be that recess should be an hour long, or that recess should not be part of the day at all.

To show your understanding, comment on this update. Write out your claim. Then, make a list of at least 4 counter-claims for your claim. Number the counter-claims strongest (#1) to weakest (#4) and explain in a paragraph why you ranked them the way you did. 

Argument Structure

The pieces of your argument during this project will differ based on your audience, your claim, and the availability of supporting evidence, and the emphasis on the parts might change based on the product you've chosen. Plan a conference with your teacher if you're unsure of what an argument should include in your product type. A review of the elements of argument can be found here

Argument Production

Based on your product type, you will, in some way, be presenting this information to an audience. Take a look at the resource here to see some tips for presentations (it's helpful even if you're not doing a live presentation to the class). 

Remember: The goal here is to convince your target audience to agree with you. Develop your presentation with them in mind, using media and words and phrases that will make sense to them!

Your Update

Now you can work on the argument content for your project! Feel free to seek out feedback from peers and from your teacher as you're working. Always keep your target audience in mind!

In your update, you should include the text, a link to, or a screenshot of your argument content in your product. Comment on at least three classmates' updates with feedback on the argument and media elements. Remember your netiquette, both in your comments and as the creator. Not everyone who comments will be in your target audience, but the feedback is valuable! Use it to refine and improve your product before moving on to Update 8.

8. Conclusion & Peer Review

Teacher Content

From Update 6 forward, this unit focuses on students working on the individual components of their projects. Therefore, the instructions are deliberately broad, to allow for the wide range of project topics and product selections. The instructor's role through the remainder of the updates will be to conference with students regularly to ensure success throughout the process and monitor student conversations in class and on the platform to facilitate positive and constructive communication.

The pacing of the next few updates will vary widely by students, so consider posting 6-8 together to allow students to work at the pace appropriate for them.

This update focuses on developing effective conclusion on the topic with the target audience in mind.

At the end of this update, students will submit their final project product for peer review using this rubric:

Depending on student familiarity with this rubric, the teacher may need to adjust the rubric focus or values. 

CCSS Addressed:

  • W.6.1 - Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
  • W.6.1.E - Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from the argument presented.
  • W.6.4 - Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

For Struggling Learners:

  • Consider strategically placing students with similar topics near each other to allow for conversation that may help clarify thinking and progress.
  • For individuals who are struggling, make time to conference regularly to monitor progress and potentially make changes to requirements to help students succeed.
  • Have students read their argument content and immediately read their conclusion to make sure that the conclusion actually does follow from their argument content.

For Excelling Students:

  • ​Students can accellerate through Updates 6-8 at their own pace.
  • Consider having students who are moving quickly (AND doing well) become "texperts" (experts on a particular tech tool) or "product managers" (sounding boards for other students about a particular product choice).
  • Students whose writing skills are strong could be utilized as peer reviewers more frequently. Potentially, these students could even offer small group sessions re: individual parts of the writing process for students whose peer reviews show deficiencies in one area.

Student Content

In this update, you will:

  • Review how to compose an effective conclusion.
  • Create the conclusion for your project.
  • Submit your product for peer review.

Conclusions:

A conclusion is the final impression that the audience is left with in any publication, presentation, or media. It needs to be effective and persuasive. 

This resource offers several suggestions for creating effective conclusions, as does the video below.

Media embedded March 3, 2019

It's time to finish your project product! You will submit your project at the end of this update and receive peer products to review before final publication. Use the rubric below to self-assess before submitting, and remember to include a strong conclusion!

Your Comment on this Update:

​Reflect on the most challenging part of this project process for you. Why was that a struggle? Was it the topic, the argument, the writing, the time management, etc. Respond to as many classmates as you'd like, offering positive feedback and helpful insights.

9. Unit Summary & Publication Party

This is an off-line suggestion, not an update for students. Once projects have been reviewed, revised, and published, consider having a few days where students rotate through stations, reviewing product types. They can sit in the audience for live peer presentations, view video projects, peruse websites and digital galleries, and walk the halls reviewing posters created by their peers. 

Consider including some kind of capture sheet for audience members, focusing on all of the positive impacts that they've learned about.