Produced with Scholar
Icon for Police Instructor Development

Police Instructor Development

Learning Module

Abstract

This learning module presents a high-level overview of instructional theory and practice intended to enhance the teaching abilities of police instructors. It is built on the premise that law enforcement trainers have not been given adequate tools to facilitate learning among their trainees.

Keywords

Police, public safety, vocational training, job training, Problem-Based Learning, PBL, pedagogy, andragogy, instructor development

Course Overview

This learning module presents information necessary for law enforcement trainers to enhance the learning outcomes of their students. It has been prepared in a conscious effort to place learners at the center of the training experience and seeks to emphasize the trainer’s role as a facilitator of learning as opposed to a lecturer. It has been built in an effort to integrate pedagogical principles with aspects of Adult Education Theory in order to build and promote an instructional repertoire allowing for learning among diverse students.

Creation of this module has been heavily informed by my practice as a law enforcement trainer and motivated by frustrations relating to instructor aptitude. In his research, Shipton (2011) highlights the failure of police agencies to promote instructional skill among their trainers. McCoy (2006) echoes this concern and offers that training conducted must shift to a learner-centered design with a focus on problem solving in order to help achieve societal expectations of police. Indeed, my experience as both a provider and consumer of law enforcement training has proven these concerns to be well grounded. Instructors are frequently trained to check boxes required by State mandate and legal counsel, and little effort is focused on ensuring understanding among students.

This instructor development course is an original concept and intended to be a high-level overview of educational principles as well as their applications which might inform police training. It acknowledges the distinct needs of the adult learner without accepting hard divisions between pedagogical and andragogical theory. This iteration of the module is intended to be administered live in a physical classroom consistent with the vast majority of police training classes, and it is anticipated that it will take forty hours administered over five days to complete. The module will be mediated by electronic device (computer, tablet, etc.) as a means to facilitate independent learning, peer feedback, and the creation of an electronic student portfolio. Satisfactory demonstration of learning outcomes will be proven via this portfolio of work created during class. The portfolio will include original reflections as well as a peer reviewed project related to police scenario development.

In keeping with the purposes stated above, it is hoped that this and similar efforts might result in improved outcomes for law enforcement learners and the communities they serve.

Assessment and Evaluation

For the Student

Students in this course will demonstrate comprehension in two ways:

1. Students will write original reflections and updates based on the material for each sub-module. 

2. Students will complete a final project which involves creating a scenario for trainees to participate in. This scenario will be evaluated by classmates according to a rubric provided by the instructor.

These two components will comprise the student's portfolio which will be used to support the issuance of the training certificate. 

In addition to these requirements, the students will also participate in pre/post-course knowledge surveys to gauge improvement.    

For the Instructor

In order to justify the issuance of a State training certificate, students will generate a portfolio of work by responding to prompts throughout the course. Feedback both instructor-to-student and student-to -student should be emphasized and welcomed throughout the course. 

The pre/post-course knowledge survey below should be administered at the beginning and end of class in an effort to gauge trainee improvement. 

Pre/Post-Course Knowledge Survey

  

Intended Learning Outcomes

For the Student

Central Christian Academy (2019)

Provide the class with a brief introduction. What agency are you from? How long have you been in law enforcement? What disciplines do you teach? Additionally, state a goal you hope to achieve as a result of this class or tell a story about a time you had to deal with particularly poor instruction. What was so terrible about the instructor's techniques? Did they make you more or less interested in the subject matter? (Please be courteous to those who didn't have the benefit of this course. Omit the names and agencies of your less skilled instructors.)    

TLNT (2016)

At the conclusion of this class, students will be able to:

1. Explain the purpose and benefits of quality instructor development
2. Describe types of human motivation and explain their applicability to learning
3. Explain central tenets of adult learning theory
4. Understand the term “pedagogy” and describe its utility in police training
5. Demonstrate use of the Problem-Based Learning Model and describe its applicability to police  training
6. Demonstrate a working understanding of scenario development through the creation of a realistic prompt supported by learning goals

 

For the Instructor

The class will eventually be asked to come together in groups in order to solve problems. Allow the students time to introduce themselves and their interests now in order to facilitate the process of team building. Additionally, use the bad instructor stories as a means to jumpstart student goal setting and reinforce the real-world applicability of the topic to the class.[Pedagogical support for this strategy is offered by Brown et al. (2018) who highlight that creating an atmosphere of community among instructors and instructional support personnel is ultimately beneficial to students.

Utilize this opportunity to offer a lesson on the value of the informed learner. Explain that each instructional update will begin with an introduction of the intended learning outcomes in an effort to prime the students. Add emphasis to the notion that the adult trainees the students are soon to teach will be expected to direct a fair amount of the learning process whenever possible. How are they to map out their educational journeys if they don’t know the final destination? [Knowles (1973) notes that Adult Learning Theory mandates that students understand why they need to learn something. Furthermore, Woodard (2007) confirms the applicability of the theory to job training.]

Students in this course are likely to be newly created police instructors in early to middle stages of their careers. They will almost certainly have been indoctrinated into law enforcement and will need to be shown the applicability of the class materials to their instructor duties. Expect them to be inherently doubtful of your presentation. It is appropriate to acknowledge this doubt and express that the application of educational principles to police training may seem foreign. Ask the trainees to engage with the material authentically. Class participation and engagement with the material is welcomed at all stages.

Need for Instructor Development

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the end of this section, the learner should be able to explain the purpose and benefits of quality instructor development efforts.

Instructor development is critical to the effective practice of police training. Instructors, students, and agencies benefit substantially when training is well-crafted and supported by validated educational theory. Your continued success as police instructors will largely depend on your willingness and ability to adopt new approaches to teaching. Consider the following and its implications for your instructional practices:

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Lima, 2014)

Simon Sinek (above) asks us to consider why we engage in a given practice and offers hope for trainers seeking to reach their students.  

Moving from the abstract to the practical, how exactly does instructor development benefit police agencies and individual instructors? 

Participate in the following instructional activity to facilitate class discussion:

Take approximately forty-five minutes:

Briefly comment on an idea contained in this material you found thought provoking. 

Create an update detailing how instructor development applies to you. Give examples of training deficiencies you believe could have been mitigated through quality instructor development. These failures can be yours or another’s. No names, please.

If you finish early, please feel free to examine any supplemental materials you contained in the learning module. 

Supplemental materials:

Nick Fuhrman TEDx: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwTpfVQgkU0

Student-Centered Learning TEDx: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzQhiB2EOVE

 

For the Instructor

Sinek video commentary: In response to the Start with Why video, ask the class what they do as police trainers. Ask the class how they accomplish their mission as police trainers. Ask the class why they do what they do as police trainers. Bring up Sinek’s application of the principle to Apple. (Question for the class): What product are we selling? (Answer): We’re selling knowledge and skill. It just has to be knowledge and skill our students believe in. The purpose of instructor development is to train our sales force. [Support for a video pedagogy is established by Andrist et al. (2014) who note that videos not explicitly related to or prepared for the topic of instruction may hold special promise.] Offer the above pedagogical support as a lesson to the class. It won't be necessary to explore theory in detail, but be sure to emphasize that instructional aids don't always have to relate directly to law enforcement. Don't be afraid to branch out and engage your learners with diverse skill and interests. 

Benefits of development commentary: Review the benefits of instructor development slide. Highlight frequent complaints regarding the effectiveness of police training and tie-in contents of the slide. (Question to the class): How do we expect to fix this problem internally if we don’t learn how to teach?

Instructional activity:

1. Have the students pair up with a partner not previously known to them. Give the students about five minutes to complete the task and ask them to remain in their pairs when done. List the most common attributes when the groups are ready. [Pedagogical support for working in pairs is offered by Biju (2019) who note that working in pairs affects performance in a positive way, works well for diverse students, improves attitudes, and assists with the filling of gaps in knowledge had by the group participants.

2. Now have the students respond to the following prompts as a whole class: How much experience should the trainer have on the job? What is the preferred background for that trainer? List the most common responses when done. Ask how many agencies represented have trainers meeting these criteria. Do they have equally talented personnel to replace them when they leave? It is anticipated that few will have such talented and complete instructors. Note to the class: For success, we must ensure consistent quality instruction over successive generations of officers. Instructor development allows us to accomplish this mandate. 

3. Upon conclusion of this activity, ask the class how it enjoyed working in pairs. Discuss the pedagogical support offered under point one of this activity. Ask how working in pairs might be used to improve the learning outcomes of students in each of the class members' instructional disciplines. 

Exploration of Human Motivation

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the end of this section, the learners should be able to describe the two dominant types of human motivation and their applicability to police training.

Any successful trainer should have an understanding of motivation if he/she is to drive an interest in others. Understanding motivation allows you to adapt your practices to promote engagement among your students which leads to a more fulfilling experience for all. Watch the video below and consider the implications for instructional design: 

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Olin College of Engineering, 2015)

Consider the following common motivators and the implications they hold for police training:

Unknown (n.d.)

Take approximately forty-five minutes:

Briefly comment on an idea contained in this material you found thought provoking.

Create an update discussing a time you were intrinsically motivated to learn a task in policing. What motivated you? How might you apply this experience to your job as an instructor?

If you finish early, please feel free to examine any of the supplemental materials contained in the learning module. You are also encouraged to review your peers' previous updates and reply as appropriate.  

Supplemental materials: 

Kerwin Rae motivation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6NzkAJtuJg

For the Instructor

Deci video commentary: Engage the class by asking it to identify implications for instructional design. Note that autonomous and controlled motivation are frequently referred to as intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Facilitate whole class discussion via the following prompts: 1. What extrinsic motivators do we frequently encounter in police training? 2. How might Deci recommend we structure a police training to maximize autonomous or intrinsic motivation in our students?

Types of motivators infographic commentary: (Question to class): Which of the listed intrinsic motivators might we be most able to tap into as instructors? Why? [Pedagogical support for the use of infographics as concise representations of knowledge is offered by Yildirim (2016). It is said they are considered of greater instructional value than plain text materials.] Discuss this pedagogical support as a means to address how we present information. There are times when we have to present text-based content, but it can be done in a more engaging way with only modest effort. "Death by PowerPoint" is a real phenomenon. Let's do our part to avoid it.  

 

Adult Learning Explored

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the end of this section, students should be able to explain key aspects of Adult Learning Theory and identify their applicability to police training.

It is important to understand that adults learn differently than children. Teaching police officers almost exclusively mandates that trainers understand principles of adult education. 

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Kopp, 2017)

Dr. David Kopp (above) explores the optimum conditions for adult learning. This is invaluable information for police trainers.  

Choice has been shown to be key for adult learners. Accordingly, pick an activity from the following options to help reinforce your understanding of course concepts:

Take approximately forty-five minutes:

Briefly comment on an idea contained in this material you found thought provoking. 

Create an update discussing an aspect of adult learning that is particularly important to you. Give specific examples of times your training was positively or negatively impacted by this principle.

If you finish early, please feel free to examine any of the supplemental materials contained in the learning module. You are also encouraged to review your peers' previous updates and reply as appropriate.

Supplemental materials:

Pedagogy vs. Andragogy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CztomeFzNoQ

PoliceOne Article: https://www.police1.com/police-trainers/articles/curriculum-development-for-law-enforcement-pedagogy-versus-andragogy-h7nk5BwFRgHNlsV6/

 

For the Instructor

Kopp video commentary: Present the video and engage the class by asking it to identify implications for instructional design. (Facilitate whole class discussion via the following prompt): What are some of the quickest ways we could lose the engagement of our trainees?

Activity commentary: Explain that you would like to give the class a choice regarding the next activity. Participants will be allowed to 1. engage in scenarios emphasizing either adult learning successes or failures that partners or small groups will be expected diagnose, or 2. design an activity with a partner related to a chosen field of instruction intended to enhance intrinsic motivation among trainees. During this time, you should be walking around checking in on groups. Offer assistance as necessary. Attempt to enrich the discussion and work products through thought provoking prompts. [Note that pedagogical support for allowing trainee choice is offered by Adult Learning Theory itself.]

Be careful to monitor your small groups for active participation. Offer scenarios to act out if the group becomes stuck. Possible examples include: an instructor who insists on discussing the technical aspects of an Intoxilyzer machine even though the trainee is not expected to know such information and cannot legally testify to its scientific basis (failure- lacks relevancy), an instructor who spends an inordinate amount of time discussing the application of the Incident Command System to short-term and small scale police incidents (failure- the problem posed is impractical), and the instructor who begins a lesson with a well formulated list of reasons why students should become proficient with a particular topic (success- fulfills the requirement that students know why they are expected to learn a given topic).    

Pedagogy Explored

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the end of this section, students should be able to understand the concept of pedagogy and its applicability to police training.

Understanding the methods used to train your students can be of substantial benefit to your performance as an instructor. The term this course will use to describe these methods is pedagogy. Don't get hung up on the differences between pedagogy and adragogy described in the Adult Learning section of this course. The word is being used as a generic phrase for instructional practices. 

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(3 Minute Ed Theory, 2018)

The video (above) from 3 Minute Ed Theory describes the necessity for good teachers to have both knowledge of course content and instructional practices. Improving understanding of teaching practices is an essential goal of our class.

This course will describe two overall instructional principles of particular utility to police training- didactic teaching and authentic education. An egregious example of didactic teaching might look something like this: 

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Artur, 2012)    

Contrast the portrayal above with an example of authentic education in the following video:

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Edutopia, 2016)

Consider this comparison of the two pedagogical principles:

Take approximately forty-five minutes:

Briefly comment on an idea contained in this material you found thought provoking.

Create an update describing pedagogies you have personally seen used frequently by police instructors. Using your newfound understanding of pedagogical methods, explain a time you believe a particular pedagogy was mismatched to a lesson. How might you act in the future to correct such a deficiency?

Supplemental materials: 

Stephen Baldridge TEDx: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CztomeFzNoQ

 

 

For the Instructor

Pedagogical Content Knowledge video commentary: Present the video and engage the class in discussion regarding the diverse possibilities of instructional practices. Again, define pedagogy explicitly as the approach to teaching, the manner in which an instructor facilitates learning. Explain the distinction between teaching and learning. Ensure students know the difference. Focus on the notion that pedagogies can be very diverse and aren’t neatly categorized. Note the possibilities are endless and can be tailored to the needs of the subject or students.

Beuller, Beuller video commentary: Set up the video by explaining the benefit of matching pedagogical practices to the situation. Play the video and engage the class in discussion by asking how the students in the video appear to be receiving the lesson. Explain to the class that this is a particularly egregious example of didactic teaching gone wrong. The pedagogy employed here is entirely teacher-centered and discounts the role of the student. What is being portrayed on the faces of the students can be cited as an absolute lack of engagement.

Authentic ED video commentary: Frame the video by asking that the class focus more on the process of learning portrayed than the students involved or their ages. The age of the students is immaterial in the context of this lesson. Explain that what is important here and in all authentic education practices is that they are student-centered and focus on problems of relevance to the learner. The teacher acts more as a facilitator of learning and takes his/her cues from the students in order to foster engagement and deeper understanding of the subjects covered in class. 

Didactic vs. Authentic comparison slide commentary: Present slides describing didactic and authentic pedagogies. Highlight the primary distinction of teacher versus learner-centered instructional focus separating didactic teaching from authentic learning. Discuss limits of student engagement and knowledge retention inherent in misapplied didactic teaching and contrast those with the benefits the learner-centered ideology adopted in authentic pedagogy. Engage the class in discussion via the following prompt: What kind of pedagogical principle am I using to instruct you now? The students should answer that you are using didactic teaching. Continue the discussion by asking if its as painful or disengaging as the Ferris Beuller scene played earlier in the lesson. Hopefully the students inform you that it is not, and you are able to further the discussion by explaining that didactic teaching (or any pedagogy) can be useful dependent on circumstance. Explain that the students likely had little background knowledge about pedagogical principle before taking the class and that the information presented didactically is the base upon which future student engagement with the topic will be built. This is an appropriate use of didactic teaching. Discuss the danger of over-explaining concepts while engaged in didactic teaching. Allow students to “connect the dots” themselves wherever possible. [Pedagogical support for not over-explaining course content is provided by Janik (2019) who cautions against the didactic liability of stolen cognition.]

Explain how authentic pedagogy is inherently learner-centered and is far more concerned with the learning outcomes of students than the teaching practices of instructors. Authentic pedagogy empowers students to direct much of the learning process which promotes engagement and deeper understanding of the material. Explain how under authentic pedagogy, the student assists in the creation of knowledge as much as its consumption.

 

 

Problem-Based Learning

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the conclusion of this module, students should be able to demonstrate use of Problem-Based Learning strategies and apply them in a police-training specific context.

Problem-Based Learning is a method for enhancing the problem-solving skills of students. It asks trainees to apply a particular process to solving relatable problems of real-world significance to the learner. Consider the following scenario: 

A system exists to help you solve these problems and learn along the way. Watch the following video: 

Media embedded September 27, 2020

(Spencer, 2017)

Spencer (above) presents us with a framework for learning through problem solving. The practical applications of this method have substantial implications for police training.

Let's re-visit the DUI problem using the following framework:

Problem-Based Learning isn't just something instructors can use to address problems relating to their field of practice. It can also be substantially beneficial to teach the process to all officers. Consider the implications of the program described below:

Media embedded September 28, 2020

(TracyS4423, 2010)

Take approximately forty-five minutes:

Briefly comment on an idea contained in this material you found thought provoking.

Create an update discussing a training problem you are aware of which might have been benefited from the application of Problem-Based Learning. How specifically might this approach have assisted in solving the problem?

If you finish early, please feel free to examine any of the supplemental materials contained in the learning module. You are also encouraged to review your peers' previous updates and reply as appropriate.

Supplemental materials:

PBL Learning Activity video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCjievWehQc

PoliceOne Article: https://www.police1.com/police-trainers/articles/why-you-should-give-your-police-trainees-problems-not-solutions-cn5VxdQZyiGJCYG3/

For the Instructor

DUI problem commentary: Present the class with the problem of newer officers losing DUI cases due to flawed paperwork. (Initiate a discussion with the class via the following prompts): Can we agree this is a potential training issue? How should we go about developing a meaningful solution to this problem?

PBL in less than five minutes video commentary: Play the PBL in Less than Five Minutes video. (Engage the class in discussion via the following prompts): Where should we go for the information we need? What information do we need? Without answers to these questions can we move forward with confidence?

PBL step by step commentary: Present the class with the PBL Step by Step slide and walk them through the lost DUIs problem with class discussion. Provide answers to the specific inquiries of the students. Encourage them to formulate a training plan and ask how they would intend to evaluate it for success. Offer tips along the way tying-in previous class material wherever possible. Attempt to guide the students to a solution emphasizing early learning at the Academy and field training levels. What influence do they have as trainers to effect change? What resources could be tapped to help the students learn? With luck, the class will land on the common sense and highly attainable goal of crafting a field training learning module. The class will be doing exceptionally well if they suggest the State's Attorney's Office participate in the intervention as subject matter experts capable of explaining why the lesson has such significant bearing on DUI cases. [Pedagogical support for the value of scenario-based training in vocational training settings is offered by Sjoberg et al. (2019). PBL, in particular, has demonstrated value for learning in police-specific settings as established by Werth (2011).]

PTO video commentary: Engage the class in discussion by explaining the power of teaching this process to all officers. Discuss the transitioning role of police in society. Police now are frequently expected to address problems by examining their causes and implementing creative solutions outside of the traditional structure of criminal investigation and arrest. Explain that police have been tasked with handling a wide variety of social problems and that mainstream police training hasn’t effectively equipped them for. Identify that creative solutions of officers are valued now more than ever and should be modeled in police training practices. Explain that teaching people how to learn and solve their own problems will lead to better and more advanced training in the future. Play the PTO video as an example of PBL in widespread practice.

 

 

Scenario Development

For the Student

Intended Learning Outcome: At the conclusion of this module, students should have developed a working understanding of police training scenario development and be able to prepare a scenario supported by learning goals. 

Scenarios have particular implications for police training as they are a way to prepare for the almost limitless circumstances officers might encounter on a daily basis. Scenarios should not be prepared hastily, though. They must be well-conceived in order to present the educational opportunities desired from training. All effective training scenarios should adhere to the following guidelines: 

Apply this knowledge now by crafting a scenario of your own. In doing so, be sure to adhere to the guidelines below. They will be used by a peer to evaluate your final product. You will have one hour to complete the task. 

Upon completing the scenario, it will be assigned to a classmate who will review it using the rubric below. Should you find yourself with time between scenario completion and assessment, feel free to review the supplemental materials contained in the learning modules or read and respond to classmates' prior updates as appropriate. 

Scenario Project Rubric

 

For the Instructor

Scenario development slides commentary: Review slide content giving particular examples of application where appropriate.  

Scenario project guidelines commentary: Ask the students to craft scenarios of particular relevance to their instructional duties. Reiterate that successful final scenarios must adhere to the bulleted requirements and that they will be critiqued by classmates. Give the students the opportunity to complete the assignment and be present to assist as necessary.  

Upon completion and review, give the students a short amount of time to make any suggested revisions. Next, ask them to give a short three to five minute oral presentation on the scenarios they developed paying particular attention to the underlying educational theories they use to support their work. This represents the final opportunity students will have in this class to benefit from each other's contributions. 

Prior to dismissing the class, be sure to have them complete the Post-Course Knowledge Survey below. You can compare them with results from the Pre-Course Survey to gauge trainee improvement. 

Pre/Post-Course Knowledge Survey

 

References

Andrist, L., Chepp, V., Dean, P., & Miller, M. V. (2014). Toward a Video Pedagogy: A Teaching Typology with Learning Goals. Teaching Sociology, 42(3), 196–206.

Artur. (2012, September 4). Most boring lesson ever! Anyone? [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUjhSBjxuXA

Bethanie H. (2014, September 6). Problem based learning activity [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCjievWehQc

Biju, S. M. (2019). Benefits of Working in Pairs in Problem Solving and Algorithms—Action Research. Athens Journal of Education, 6(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.6-3-4

Brown, B. D., Horn, R. S., & King, G. (n.d.). The Effective Implementation of Professional Learning Communities. 7.

Central Christian Academy. (2019) First Day of School. [Illustration]. https://dunkirkcca.org/event/ccas-first-day-of-school/

Curriculum development for law enforcement: Pedagogy versus Andragogy. (n.d.). Police1. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from https://www.police1.com/police-trainers/articles/curriculum-development-for-law-enforcement-pedagogy-versus-andragogy-h7nk5BwFRgHNlsV6/

Edutopia. (2016, November 1). Solving real-world problems: Bringing authentic context to learning [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3IL0J3XMbA

Janík, T., Slavík, J., Najvar, P., & Janíková, M. (2019). Shedding the content: Semantics of teaching burdened by didactic formalisms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1552719

Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing.

Kopp, D. (2017, June 27). Andragogy: Adult learning principles [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_MAdKLDX6A

Lima, C. (2014, March 3). Simon Sinek- start with why- TED talk short edited [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPYeCltXpxw

McCoy, M. R. (2006). Teaching Style and the Application of Adult Learning Principles by Police Instructors. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 29(1), 77–91.

Olin College of Engineering. (2015, October 7). Intrinsic motivation with Dr. Edward Deci [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ba7bpEUONM

Rae. K. (2017, January 31). Extrinsic motivation vs intrinsic motivation [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6NzkAJtuJg

Reinhard, J. (2017, March 14). elearning series “andragogy v pedagogy” (1/5) [Video}. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VANpFBcNXZg

Shipton, B. (2011). Expanding police educators’ understanding of teaching, are they as learner-centred as they think? Journal of Learning Design, 4(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v4i2.71

Sjöberg, D., Karp, S., & Rantatalo, O. (2019). What students who perform in “secondary roles” can learn from scenario training in vocational education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.3

Spencer, J. (2017, November 12). What is problem-based learning? [Video] Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGoJIQYGpYk

TEDx Talks. (2015, May 11). The more you’re taught, the less you know [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CztomeFzNoQ

TEDx Talks (2018, April 11). The one thing all great teachers do [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwTpfVQgkU0

TEDx Talks (2018, April 26). Students need to lead the classroom, not teachers [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzQhiB2EOVE

TLNT. (2016). Goals Sign. [Photo illustration]. https://www.tlnt.com/5-ways-to-set-clear-and-focused-team-goals/

TracyS4423. (2010, August 30). The police training officer model (pto) [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O_K9UGoESA

Unknown, (n.d.). Types of motivators [Infographic]. Motivation and Engagement: Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation. https://m0t1v8me.wordpress.com/2013/10/10/intrinsic-vs-extrinsic-motivation/

Werth, E. (2011). Scenario training in police academies: Developing students’ higher-level thinking skills. Police Practice & Research, 12(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.563970

Why you should give your police trainees problems, not solutions. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2020, from https://www.police1.com/police-trainers/articles/why-you-should-give-your-police-trainees-problems-not-solutions-cn5VxdQZyiGJCYG3/

Woodard, C. (2007). Using adult learning theory for new-hire training. MPAEA Journal of Adult Education, 36(1), 44-47.

Yildirim, S. (2016). Infographics for educational purposes: Their structure, properties and reader approaches. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 98-110.

3 Minute Ed Theory. (2018, September 12). What makes teachers special?- Pedagogical content knowledge [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTM9rzc-pq8