Produced with Scholar
Icon for Meaningful and Innovative Flipped Learning Approach

Meaningful and Innovative Flipped Learning Approach

Faculty Development Training

Learning Module

Abstract

The workshop is a blended faculty training project designed for the faculty in the Continuing Education School of the Defense Language Institute. The goal of the training is to intensify the faculty understanding and innovative implication of the Flipped Learning Approach (FLA).

Keywords

Flipped Learning Approach, Flipped Classroom, Constructivism, Bloom's Taxonomy, Reflexive Learning, Productive Failure.

Introduction

The "Meaningful and Innovative Flipped Learning Approach" is a blended faculty training project designed for the faculty members in the Continuing Education (CE) School of the Defense Language Institute (DLI). The flipped classroom is not a n concept in the language institute. However, many instructors view the approach as "let student teach" or "doing homework exercises in the classroom".  Such confusion calls for training that can clarify the misunderstanding with updated research findings. The goal of the training is to intensify the CE faculty understanding and innovative implication of the Flipped Learning Approach (FLA). 

The co-authors of this training both have profound experience in instructional design and faculty professional development. With the knowledge of the training needs and learners' profiles, the training mode is described as following:

1/ 100% online: CE faculty also includes the members in Language Training Detachment (LTD) sites in the remote locations. Therefore the training will be carried out 100% online for effective delivery and collaboration.

2/ Training elements: including self-paced online learning content, synchronous online sessions, online discussion, and a final project presentation as the mean of assessment.

3/ The concept: the FLA is embedded in the training design to further the learning experience with active learning. In addition, based on the feedback from the other training events, this training highlights the hands-on practices of the educational tools available to the DLI faculty members.

4/ Scholarly reference: flipped learning as used in this workshop will consist of continual cycling through four steps coined by Swart (2018): a) Planning the syllabus; b) Teaching the course; c) Measuring results; d) Developing improvement alternatives based on the results.

Figure 1 below illustrates the FLA training framework design the participants will be explored to:

Figure 1. Training Framework Design

Module Description

Training Objectives

Through the training, participants will be able to

  • recognize the theoretical standing of FLA 
  • discuss the benefits and limitations of FLA
  • interpret the steps of building the flipped learning
  • choose the appropriate educational technology tools and pedagogical models to enhance FLA
  • construct a comprehensive lesson plan incorporating the FLA

Course size: 6-8 participants

Training Schedule

Figure 2. Training Outline
  • 1st day: 1 hr orientation to go over the training outline, training requirements and expectations, and tech requirements.
  • 1st week: Module I - IV; self-paced learning; assignments, and comments posting; online session on Day 5.
  • 2nd - 3rd week: Module V; self-paced learning; assignments and comments posting; online session on Day 5 of the week.
  • 4th week: Module VI - VII; self-paced learning, meeting online on the final day presenting the final project, assignment and comments posting, and peer-review.
  • Online Q&A: One hour every day, facilitators will be available via the MS Teams chat channel to take questions and discuss learning content.

Training Requirements

Participants have to fulfill the following tasks to

  • Study the Module contents at their own paces
  • Respond to the comment questions (at least 50 words) of each Module on MS Wiki
  • Post Module assignment entries (at least 200 words) and provide three feedbacks (at least 50 words) to other participants' entry on MS Wiki
  • Prepare the oral presentations for Module V in the online session (details in Module V)
  • Design a cohesive lesson plan for the final presentation (details in Module VII).

Training Platform 

  • All training content is organized on MS Wiki, with the exception of the training content in Module 5.1. This content is delivered via the educational technology tools introduced in the module (presented in CGScholar for this assignment)
  • Participant assignment entries are posted in MS Wiki 
  • Comments of each update are exchanged in Comments area of MS Wiki 
  • Online sessions are hosted on MS Teams

==========================================================================

I. Background and Definition of FLA

One week before the training starts, please fill out the pre-course survey and let us know more about you. Thank you.

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. know the definition of the flipped learning approach;
  2. distinguish the differences between the traditional and flipped classroom.

For Participants

The "Flipped Learning Approach" (FLA) was first coined by Lage et al. (2000) when they opined on the concept of "inverted learning". Therein they explain that inverting the classroom is an approach that occurs when “events that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom now take place outside the classroom and vice versa” (Lage et al., 2000, p. 30-43). Of course, words like ‘inverted’ and ‘flipped’ can have different connotations and thus it has subsequently been noted that varying interpretations of this definition can create the idea of unstructured classroom design (Eppard & Rochdi, 2017).

To counter common misconceptions and bring clarity to discussions about “Flipped Learning,” the governing board and key leaders of the Flipped Learning Network (FLN) announced a formal definition of the term. Flipped Learning is defined as "a pedagogical approach in which direct instruction moves from the group learning space to the individual learning space, and the resulting group space is transformed into a dynamic, interactive learning environment where the educator guides students as they apply concepts and engage creatively in the subject matter" (FLN, 2014, p.1). The video below aptly describes the flipped classroom model:

Media embedded June 14, 2020

Faculty Innovation Center, UTA (2013, July 23) The Flipped Classroom Model [Video File]. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/flipped-classroom

Abeysekera and Dawson (2015) provide a more succinct definition, foregrounding the active nature of what happens in class instead of merely focusing on the use of videos: “Flipped classroom approaches remove the traditional transmissive lecture and replace it with active in-class tasks and pre/post-class work” (p.1). The role of the teacher is switched "from sage on the stage to guide on the side," emphasizing the importance of the use of class time for the construction of meaning rather than information transmission.

[IN-CLASS ACTIVITY]

Group-work: work collaboratively to identify the experiences between a traditional class and flipped class from teacher and students' perspectives. Exchange your inputs with your peers and discuss which learning approach shows superiority and why.

[Comment]

Elaborate your takeaway on the description of the flipped classroom. What do you think the teacher's role switching "from sage on the stage to guide on the side"?

[Assignment]

1. Update: Try to flip one lesson this week and share your experience in the learning community of this workshop. What did you do to flip your classroom at the three phases, i.e. before class, during class, and after class? How did your students respond to the approach? Did you feel confused? What challenges have you encountered while flipping your classroom? 

2. Review the updates online and comment on at least 3 other colleagues' updates.

For Facilitators

This module is focusing on the background and definition of the flipped learning approach. The participants are required to preview this module and log in to the online ses for collaborative learning. Day 1 will be an orientation and group discussion based on the learning material of Module 1. 

[IN-CLASS ACTIVITY] Instruction for the facilitators:

Group-work: Assign participants into two groups to conduct a comparative study regarding traditional learning and flipped learning. Each group of participants will focus on the teacher and student's roles in the three stages, and the benefits of that teaching model.  After 10 minutes of the discussion within the group, have each group come up with a poster on the whiteboard in MS Teams representing its ideas, then shares it with other groups. This activity will help facilitators understand the participants' prior knowledge about the flipped learning approach. It's one of the strategies to know the participants' ZPD. 

[ASSIGNMENT] Note for the facilitators:

The assignment is designed in line with the "productive failure" theory that entails learners should be allowed to struggle a little and attempt to solve problems for themselves before they are explicitly taught a solution method. The approach of "productive failure" can stimulate students' schemas and activate their prior knowledge networks. Then after explicit instruction provided by teachers, students will be able to consolidate and assembly new knowledge. This theory will be elaborated later in module V. This activity will help the participants recognize the gaps in their knowledge.  The participants may become more focused on these gaps or more motivated to close them during later teaching. The facilitators need to ensure prompt assistance when the participants feel confused or puzzled while practicing the FLA. The participants will be asked in the post-workshop survey to evaluate whether the workshop helped them focus on filling in their gaps. 

 

 

II. Theories Underpinning FLA

This module will explore how learning theories connect with the flipped learning approach and how components of these theories are operationalized. Two time-tested pedagogical theories are considered to apply to flipped learning. One is constructivism/ZPD and the other is Bloom's Taxonomy.

2.1 Constructivism and ZPD

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. understand the learning process in line with Constructivism and the Zone of Proximal Development;
  2. incorporate the concept of ZPD into teaching to cultivate students to think for themselves and solve problems individually.

For Participants

Regarding constructivism, Piaget (1978) focused on how humans make meaning in relation to the interaction between their experiences and their ideas. His ‘constructivist’ views tended to focus on human development in relation to what is occurring with an individual from development influenced by other persons. In line with his views, learners' collaboration, interaction, and engagement in the flipped classroom fully reveals the practice of constructivism in learning. Thus the in-class flipped learning is described as utilizing active and problem-based learning activities that draw heavily from the constructivist approach.

In practice, when classes are flipped, in-class times that would have been used for face-to-face lectures are repurposed for other activities hitherto considered homework exercises and other engaging activities such as class projects, and discussions around issues arising from students’ interactions with the prescribed content (Tucker, 2012). The feature of social interaction in FLA is underpinned by Vygotsky's theory of social constructivism which emphasizes the importance of sociocultural learning. Vygotsky (1978) asserts that learning is a process that occurs when a learner is interacted and assisted by more skillful learners or instructors, and that learning is streamlined by cooperation inside the student's zone of proximal development (ZPD).

Figure 3. Zone of Proximal Development

 Vygotsky (1978) describes the ZPD as "the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem-solving under adult guidance, or in collaboration with more capable peers" (p.34). Therefore, in the flipped classroom, when students are engaged beyond their current competency level in a problem-solving activity alongside a more proficient peer, qualitative and measurable learning takes place.

The ZPD is a useful concept for teachers. To ensure that students are learning in their ZPD, teachers must provide new opportunities for students to work slightly beyond their current skills and provide ongoing, scaffolded support to all students. 

To assist a person to move through the ZPD, educators are encouraged to focus on three important components which aid the learning process (McLeod, 2019):

  • The presence of someone with knowledge and skills beyond that of the learner (a more knowledgeable other).
  • Social interactions with a skillful tutor that allow the learner to observe and practice their skills.
  • Scaffolding, or supportive activities provided by the educator, or a more competent peer, to support the student as he or she is led through the ZPD.

The following video explains how ZPD works in students' learning process:

Media embedded June 16, 2020

TeachHub.com. (2019, Jan. 17). Zone of Proximal Development [Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/kTpn7LdcKZM

[Comment]

What role does the ZPD theory play in students' learning process? How do you define students' ZPD?

[Assignment]

1. Update: What can you do to incorporate the concept of ZPD into your flipped classroom to optimize students' learning at the stage of out-of-class (pre-class), in-class and post-class? 

2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' updates. 

 

For Facilitators

This module focuses on one of the most influential educational psychology, i.e. the zone of proximal development (ZPD).  It was first introduced by Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky in the 1930s. The ZPD is typically discussed in conjunction with scaffolding that was introduced in the 1970s as an expansion of Vygotsky's ideas. 

The participants may feel confused by the two concepts of "scaffolding" and "ZPD". The facilitator may bring this up during the in-class discussion. For the reference about the difference between scaffolding and ZPD, click the linked article

 

2.2 Bloom's Taxonomy

Learning Objectives:

This module focuses on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy and digital Taxonomy that are closely related to FLA. After this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. understand how the theory of Bloom's Taxonomy and its revisions impact on FLA;
  2. incorporate the revised Bloom's Taxonomy and digital Taxonomy into instructional design, particularly into FLA here.

 

For Participants

Extant literature connects FLA with Bloom's Taxonomy because FLA engages students to obtain and apply cognitive skills from lower-order thinking (outside of class) to higher-order thinking (in class). Bloom's Taxonomy provides a graphical depiction of the learning hierarchy and has become an indispensable reference as a classification system used to define and distinguish different levels of learning skills.

As new technology's development, learning has become more collaborative, innovative, and individualized. Practitioners within the field of education have thought of unique ways to connect digital tools with the framework of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, which has led to the emergence of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy. The following video explains the progressive development of Bloom's Taxonomy:

Media embedded June 15, 2020

Common Sense Education. (2016, Jul. 12). What is Bloom's Digital Taxonomy? [Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/fqgTBwElPzU

Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and FLA

Eppard and Rochdi (2017) state Bloom’s Taxonomy is relevant to FLA in that the transmission of information, which is the basis for learning, is obtained independently and outside of class; while the assimilation of information, which requires greater critical reasoning occurs during class under the guidance of an instructor or mentor. As figure 3 demonstrates, the higher the tier portrayed on the pyramid, the more assimilation is required; whereas, the lower the level, the more transmission of information occurs somewhat independently, but not completely. The areas in the middle may require a more balanced or less skewed combination of the two. The notion of describing flipped learning in terms of assimilation and transmission was highlighted by Talbert (2012).

Figure 4 provides a visualization of the transmission and assimilation of information connected to flipped learning. This version of Bloom’s Taxonomy is a newer version as developed by Anderson et al. (2001). Based on this version, the items listed in the taxonomy refer to the following:

  • remembering - retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory;
  • understanding - constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining;
  • applying - carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing;
  • analyzing - breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing;
  • evaluating - making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing;
  • creating - putting elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing (p. 67-68).
Figure 4. Synthesis of the models and theories associated with Flipped Learning

Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and FLA

The purpose of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy is to inform instructors of how to use technology and digital tools to facilitate student learning experiences and outcomes (Sneed, 2016).

Figure 5. Bloom's Digital Taxonomy
  • Remembering – To recall facts, basic concepts, or retrieval of material. Tools – Bookmarking, copying, googling, bullet-pointing, highlighting, group networking, searching
  • Understanding – To explain ideas, concepts, or construct meaning from written material or graphics. Tools – Advanced searching, annotating, blog journaling, tweeting, tagging, commenting, subscribing
  • Applying – To use information in new situations such as models, diagrams, or presentations. Tools – Calculating, Charting, editing, hacking, presenting, uploading, operating, sharing with a group
  • Analyzing – To draw connections among ideas, concepts, or determining how each part interrelate to an overall structure or purpose. Tools – Mashing, mind mapping, surveying, linking, validating
  • Evaluating – To justify a stand or decision; to make judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing. Tools – Grading, networking, rating, testing, reflecting, reviewing, blog commenting, posting, moderating
  • Creating –To produce new or original work. Tools – Animating, blogging, filming, podcasting, publishing, simulating, wiki building, video blogging, programming, directing  (Sneed, 2016).

Lightle (2011) states "Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy helps us navigate through the myriad digital tools and make choices based on the kinds of learning experiences we want students to engage in" (p.6). Selecting the most appropriate digital activity will depend on the activity’s level of difficulty tied to the cognitive levels stated within Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy.

[Comment]

What role does Bloom's Taxonomy play in your teaching and lesson planning? What is your takeaway from Figure 4 regarding the transmission out of class and assimilation in-class derived from FLA?

[Assignment]

1. Update: List the technical tools you have used for each tier of Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. What tools will you use for out of class and in-class respectively while practicing FLA, and why?

2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' posts.

 

For Facilitators

This module introduces Bloom's Taxonomy which has become the indispensable reference as a classification system used to define and distinguish different levels of learning skills. FLA emphasizes to leave the lower-order thinking skills, such as remembering and understanding at home, and optimize the in-class time with more higher-order thinking skills, such as applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.  Thus, to integrate Bloom's Taxonomy into FLA is an essential consideration while designing an effective flipped class.

III. Why Flip?

Learning Objectives

From a case study in this module, the participants should be able to:

  1. analyze the benefits of the flipped classroom from both teacher and student perspectives;
  2. discover the differences between flipped instruction vs. traditional instruction. 

 

For Participants

Flipping instructional efforts and/or entire classes is seen by many as a phenomenon with the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning events beyond the traditional (Salifu, 2016). When done well, this makes flipped learning highly efficient, since differentiation occurs naturally and students are more likely to remain engaged.

The advantages of FLA can be discussed from the perspectives of both teacher and student.

Figure 6. Benefits of a Flipped Classroom

[Comment]

Compared with the traditional classroom, what benefits/advantages of the flipped classroom prompt you to give this pedagogical approach a try? Any other benefits you have seen or anticipate from the flipped classroom from the perspective of both teachers and students. 

[Assignment]

1. Update: Watch the following video which demonstrates the advantages of the flipped classroom model over traditional instruction. What benefits can you find from the showcase from both teacher and student's perspectives? Any problems in his flipped class you noticed? 

2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' posts.

Media embedded June 16, 2020

thomaspalmerphysics. (2013, Oct. 16). Showing the Differences between a Traditional and a Flipped Classroom [Video]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/yzMFdDT6FSA

[Supplementary Material]

Read the linked article about the benefits of FLA (p.7-9)  

For Facilitators

From a case study in this module, the participants should be able to:

  1. Analyze the benefits of the flipped classroom from both teacher and student perspectives.

  2. Discover the differences between flipped instruction vs. traditional instruction.

During the in-class discussion, encourage the participants to bring up their concerns or questions towards the showcase video in addition to the advantages of FLA.

 

IV. How to Flip?

Learning Objectives

After this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. master the seven steps at four stages for the flipped learning;
  2. design a flipped model to suit their own class in line with the seven steps;
  3. identify the issues on how to flip and work on the solutions.

For Participants

The notion of flipping a classroom has become very popular across different education levels and content areas worldwide. However, teachers who are inclined to flip their classrooms need to be very cautious with the pedagogy and technology being used because the flipped classroom requires the same attention to details and intentional instructional efforts as a traditional classroom. The idea of flipping a classroom is not enough; teachers should be aware of best practices and how to implement them for successful results.

7 STEPS for Efficient Flipped Learning

There are many ways to conduct a flipped class, but there are key principles needed to be incorporated in course design with FLA. The following seven steps of the flipped model are categorized by the four stages of FLA: 

Pre-Flip Stage

Step 1: Identify where the flipped classroom model makes the most sense for your course; Determine the technology that can best help you and your students, such as MS teams, Bookwidgets, Nearpod, PlaypositPadlet, and etc. (Note that Bookwidgets and Nearpod will be introduced in Module V.)

Step 2: Adapt your materials for students to acquire course content in preparation of class; You can either curate existing materials or create your own video and content, and keep it short and sweet. 

Out-of-Class Stage

Step 3: Make sure the learning materials are followed with meaningful and engaging homework materials. Note that some apps, such as Nearpod and Bookwidgets allow teachers to monitor students' performance in quizzes and provide students with immediate feedback or guidance.

The following video demonstrates how the UT instructors developed structures for students to engage in course content before class by either creating their own materials or curating what already exists and placing it online:

Media embedded June 16, 2020

Faculty Innovation Center (UT). (n.d.). How do you flip a class? [Video]. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/how-to-flip

In-Class Stage

Step 4: Make your students accountable. One secret to success for the flipped learning is to make sure students come to class with the background information they need. Plan to start class with a brief assessment to make sure everyone is ready. In addition, give your students a chance to clear up confusion early in the lesson with an active Q&A session.

Step 5: Clarify connections between inside and outside of class learning. Begin with the end in mind. Integrate the learning objectives into inside and outside of classroom. Make sure the tasks designed for in-class are highly engaging and closely connected with the content students learned outside of class. 

Step 6: Spend class time engaging students in higher-order thinking activities with feedback. True flipped learning turns classroom time into a more individualized experience. Instead of an instructor addressing all students as a group, learners move at their own pace or in small groups to apply their knowledge in hands-on ways; this allows for a more differentiated experience overall.

The following video illustrates the in-class stage of flipped learning:

Media embedded June 16, 2020

Faculty Innovation Center (UT). (n.d.). How do you flip a class? [Video file]. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/how-to-flip

Post-Class Stage

Step 7: Extend learning beyond class through individual and collaborative practice. Make good use of social media to engage students into collaborative learning to stimulate their communication, creativity, and critical thinking skills. Conclude with an assessment or peer-feedback before moving on to the new learning materials (Faculty Innovation Center, n.d.).

[Comment]

On what topics would your students benefit from the flipped class the most under your expert guidance in the classroom?

[Assignment]

  1. Update: Please refer to the linked article "How do You Flip a Class?" and come up with your thoughts to connect your teaching planning with each step at the four stages introduced in this module.  While planning the flipped class, what challenges or concerns do you anticipate? You will have an opportunity to share your post with your teammates and facilitator during the in-class time. 
  2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' posts.

[Supplementary Materials]

4 Pillars of F-L-I-P 

A Beginner's Guide to Flipped Classroom

For Facilitators

There is no "one size fits all" model to the flipping learning approach because none of the classes and students are the same. The facilitators should encourage and assist the participants to try different approaches while practicing the FLA. The assignment in this module is designed in accordance with the steps introduced in this module, i.e. step 3-7. 

Here are some tips to give your teachers pertaining to the common hurdles. Meanwhile, it is a great resource for the facilitators to have self-reflection as well:

Media embedded June 25, 2020

Edutopia. (2014, Nov. 4). The Flipped Class: Overcoming Common Hurdles [video]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/bwvXFlLQClU

For how to record and create lectures, refer to this linked article:

20 Video Recording apps [+BONUS TIP]

V. Applications of FLA

Update V includes two parts:

  • 5.1 FLA with Educational Technology;
  • 5.2 FLA with various Pedagogical Design.

Participants will gain direct experience with the hands-on practice, and be able to analyze and compare the different applications of FLA. 

5.1 FLA with Educational Technology

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. experience BookWidgets, NearPod and ThingLink from student perspectives;
  2. understand the key characteristics of BookWidgets, NearPod and ThingLink from teacher perspectives;
  3. identify the practical applications of BookWidgets, NearPod and ThingLink in FLA.

Online Session Discussion:

During the Week 2 online session, every participant will have 5 mins to present a learning object created with one of the three educational technology tools introduced. The sample can just be a structure of the idea and the discussion will be focused on 1/ the user experience and 2/ comparison of these three tools.

*Notes for the reviewer: For the real training, the following updates 5.1.1 - 5.1.3 will be presented in the educational technology tools discussed in each module. The design is to reflect the experiential learning theory. This learning process can provide the opportunity for the participants to experience the tools from the student perspective. 

5.1.1 FLA with BookWidgets

For Participants

 

 

BookWidgets is an online platform that allows instructors to create interactive lessons. Their digital template library has more than 40 different widgets in five categories: Test & Review; Games; Pictures & Video; Meth; Embedded third party; and Miscellaneous. After creating the lesson design, instructors share a link with students and they can start working individually or from home. For assessment, Bookwidgets includes the "grades and reporting" element that allows instructors to track student's results instantly. Watch the following video for a brief introduction about how to create and distribute an interactive lesson using Bookwidgets. 

Media embedded June 16, 2020

BookWidgets. (2016) How to create your own interactive digital lessons with BookWidgets. [Video] Retrieved Jun16, 2020 from: https://youtu.be/tPOHxR0prKQ

In Module IV: How to Flip?, we discuss the 7 steps of creating a flipped classroom. BookWidgets supports the FLA concept in different stages: preparing lessons, distributing lessons to students, evaluating student participation and knowledge. Read more about how BookWidgets can be used in a flipped classroom in the following web source (BookWidgets, 2016)

Flipping the Classroom: Using BookWidgets to Set Up a Flipped Classroom

In addition, BookWidgets has a wide application especially with the integration with Learning Management Systems such as Google Classroom, Canvas, iBook, Moodle, Schoology and Apple Schoolwork. Explore the following web source for the application of BookWidgets in a Flipped Classroom

[Comment]

BookWidgets have been criticized for the lower-level thinking application. Do you agree? Why?

[Assignment]

1. Create a Bookwidgets free account and explore the templates 

2. Read section 3 of the recent study (Menon, 2019) that analyzes the Bookwidget templates under test & review, games, and miscellaneous. Compare the content and your own experience with Bookwidgets, choose one of the following topics to reflect in your update entry.

Designing Online Materials for Blended Learning: Optimising on BookWidgets

 

a. How do you find the widgets under Test & Review useful in your lesson design? Can you think of any other functions that should be developed as a widget? Explain your creative idea and how that can enhance learning.

b. How do you find the game widgets applicable to adult language learners in the CE setting? Can you think of a creative application to use any of the game widgets for higher levels?

c. Menon (2019) claims "The term ‘miscellaneous’ is often misleading, for it makes one think that these widgets are not related to the teaching/ learning set up. But, on closer analysis, one finds that these widgets (particularly, three of them) are more related to planning and evaluation than to the actual teaching process (p.172). Do you agree with his analysis? Present an example of your design that applies one of the "miscellaneous" widgets in planning and evaluation.

3. Comment on at least three colleagues' updates.

[Suppelimentry Materials]

For a more foreign language instruction focused training on the widgets application, you can also watch the recording of a workshop titled "Creating an Interactive Virtual Learning Environment with Widgets" (DLIFLC, 2020) offered by DLI Faculty Development. Experienced instructors share their knowledge and demonstrate through examples of innovative activities made with various types of widgets in Bookwidgets.

(DLI login required)

Creating an Interactive Virtual Learning Environment with Widgets

For Facilitators

Module 5.1.1 introduces BookWidgets regarding the features and application and prompts the participants to evaluate the features against the research paper by Menon (2019). Following Constructivism and ZPD theory, participants will experience the tools from both student and teacher perspectives, share their findings through hands-on practice, and eventually gain enough understanding of the tool to apply it appropriately.

[Facilitation notes]

*Facilitators will actively participate in the comments and feedback.

Participants will explore BookWidges independently. Facilitators should familiarize themselves with the tool enough to participate in the discussion. However, the Facilitator's role is not the expert of the tool. Instead, focus the facilitation in encouraging the participants to narrow down their research to just a few templates using the criteria discussed below (Renard, 2020):

5 key considerations when choosing educational technology
1. Relevance

The material has a strong connection to the curriculum or the topics you are using it for. In evaluation whether your tool meets your learning goals, you might consider:

- Is the material appropriate for the student?
- Is the content factual and reliable?
- Does it align with your learning goals?

2. Navigation

Ease of use and a low learning curve is what you are looking for when you try a new tool. You might consider these questions while navigating through the tool:

- Does the material use the touchscreen effectively throughout its use?
- Is it intuitive to use?
- Is there a help function or tutorial available?

3. Customization

Complete flexibility to alter content and settings help you meet student needs. In evaluating such materials, consider these questions:

- Does it offer personalized or adaptive skill levels?
- Does it offer flexibility to customize content to meet student needs?
- Does it let users personalize the user interface?

4. Interaction

Deeply engaged students come alive and are more motivated. You might consider these questions when determining whether a material meets your criteria for interaction:

- Is the feedback specific and does it result in improved student performance?
- Is the material inviting to use?
- Are students motivated to use the tool and select it to use often?

5. Accessibility

Many materials can help you reach students with special learning needs to access abilities. In evaluating such materials, consider:

- Does the material let users personalize the user interface?
- Does the tool offer flexibility to alter settings to meet student needs?
- Does the material work with accessibility features on the mobile device?

as well as

Classroom infrastructure, or the hardware (devices) you’ll need to use a certain app or software.
Collaboration: Can students work together/ collaborate on projects?

You can share the information with the participants In a checklist format via BookWedigts (click the link to open).

5.1.2 FLA with Nearpod

For Participants

What is Nearpod?

Nearpod is an engagement tool that allows easy creation of interactive content such as Virtual Field Trips, Collaborate boards, Quizzes, Polls, Matching Pairs activities + more. Teachers can send content to student devices in real-time and students have the opportunity to send teachers responses to questions in various forms. Similar to BookWidgets, Within the context of FLA, the following resource classify the role of Nearpod in course preparation, course process, and assessment:

Using Nearpod to Support Blended and Flipped Learning

Watch a video for the Nearpod (free version) review from a teacher:

Media embedded June 13, 2020
Media embedded June 14, 2020

Bethany Petty. (2015) Nearpod Review. [Video] Retrieved Jun. 14, 2020, from: https://youtu.be/Potta_y4ZOQ

[Case Study]

Seitan et al. (2020) in their recent study proposes an FLA model integrating Nearpod as one of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools. The findings reveal the effectiveness of the flipped learning approach in terms of the students’ academic achievement. In addition, the students in the experimental group presented positive attitudes towards peers, teachers, learning environment, and process.

Figure 7. FLA model with ICT

Read the study to learn more about the course design:

The Impact of Integrating Flipped Learning and Information and Communication Technology

[Comments] 

Through your experience and research, what are the Pros and Cons of Nearpod? 

 

[Assignment]

  1. Create a free Nearpod account.
  2. Choose one of the features in Nearpod to 1/ analyze the applicability in FLA; or 2/ design an activity with FLA principle.
  3. Share your experience and thinking process in creating the object or assignment in the Update.
  4. Comment on 3 other colleagues' updates.

For Facilitators

The second tool introduced in the training is Nearpod. Same design as the previous module, participants experience the tools from both student and teacher perspectives, share their findings through hands-on practice, and eventually gain enough understanding of the tool to apply it appropriately. 

[Facilitation notes]

  • Facilitators will actively participate in the comments and feedback.
  • Facilitators can share the examples in the Nearpod library with the participants to inspire design ideas. 
  • For more traditional participants, here is an instruction in the PDF format.
Nearpod instructions

 

5.1.3 FLA with ThingLink

For Participants

ThingLink focuses on the development of visual learning experience in the cloud. The effects of virtual aids have arguments including (Koivula, 2020)

  • Humans remember pictures better than words (the “picture superiority effect”) 
  • Multisensory experience triggers simultaneous associations.
  • Virtual tours expand our fields of perception from physical to digital.

Creating a ThingLink presentation starts with uploading an image, then make the content more engaging by adding notes, sounds, narrations, videos, quizzes or any other media. Instructors can use the tool to create interactive multimodal learning content. On the other hand, using ThingLink as the platform for assignments emboldens students' higher thinking skills such as connecting ideas or digital storytelling. ThingLink also supports 360-degree videos and virtual reality. Watch the following video for a brief introduction of how to create a meaningful learning content using ThingLink:

Media embedded June 16, 2020

Russell Stannard (Teacher Training Videos). (2017). ThingLink-Quick and complete introduction #ThingLink. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QDFp0cfamQ

[Case Study]

USING THINGLINK DIGITAL POSTERS IN TEACHING ESP TO BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS STUDENTS (A CASE STUDY OF BAUMAN MOSCOW STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)

Inozemtseva et al. (2018) implement ThingLink as Digital Posters for the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course. In their ESP course, some of the conceptual theories related to the subjects (Business and Economics) such as "decontextualized theoretical issues ...can be only visualized using graphs at best" (Inozemtseva et al., 2018). Therefore the study chooses the Digital Posters model using Thinglink as the media to facilitate the learning process:

When being taught ESP in ‘English only’ format, without using L1 as an intermediary, Business and Economics students have to struggle with understanding profession-oriented lesson content and have a problem of acquiring specific vocabulary found in research journals and websites. Creation of a topic-specific DP for ESP teacher presentation is supposed to facilitate specific language acquisition, widen students’ knowledge about a curricular topic, promote ‘teacher-student’ communication capacity and cultivate general students’ interest in study.....(Inozemtseva et al., 2018)

Each DP includes a topic-specific BBC audio, TED Talks videos, and design assignments to check students’ comprehension. A ready-made Quizlet puzzles game is also used for student self-assessment. In the practice, the study found out that the enriched DPs provide more opportunities to the ESP students to discuss about the videos, listen to the pronunciation of the native speakers, play games and source related information. 

Ample ThingLink examples are available online shared by educators and instructional design experts. For the ideas of using ThingLink in the language classroom, the following video introduces several practical examples including simple vocabulary activity, enriched reading material/ diagram, collaborative information searching activity and case study:

Media embedded June 16, 2020

 

Learning Bites. (2018) Using Thinglink with Language Students. [Video] Retrieved Jun 12, 2020, from: https://youtu.be/5gjjDqxCgXg

[Comments]

Considering DLI students' learning goal in reading comprehension, what is your opinion on the role of enriched images or interactive images in your classroom?

[Assignment]

  1. Access the ThingLink app via MS Teams which is available for all DLI faculty
  2. Create an interactive learning object with at least 5 enrichments; or design an assignment requiring students to use ThingLink
  3. Share your experience and thinking process in creating the object or assignment in the Update entry
  4. Comment on 3 other participants' Update entry

For Facilitators

[Facilitation Note]

*Facilitators will actively participate in the comments and feedback.

Compare to the previous two tools, Thinglink features mainly the enriched image with more advanced video technology such as 360-degree and VR. Facilitators can provide a few examples with more updated enrichments to inspire innovative application:

Thinglink VR examples

Facilitators should remind the participants that the aim of a flipped classroom is NOT:

  • replacing the teacher with awesome videos
  • creating an online course
  • leaving students to their own devices

Facilitators can direct the participants to review Bloom's Taxonomy in Module 2.2 and think about how to apply Thinglink in each tier. 

5.2 FLA with Various Pedagogical Designs

Learning Objectives

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. understand the two prominent pedagogical designs related to FLA;
  2. grasp and incorporate the key principles to develop the flipped class with a Project-based Instruction or Productive Failure-based Flipped Classroom (PFFC);
  3. analyze and evaluate which pedagogical designs will work more effectively for the flipped class.

Online Session Discussion

1) During the Week 3 online session, each group of the 2 participants will have 10 mins to present the lesson plan reflecting FLA with PBI in accordance with the 5 keys to rigorous PBI introduced in this module. A peer-review survey will be incorporated as a formative assessment. The participants will be given some time to revise or polish their lesson plans and move forward to the final project.

2) Have a roundtable discussion about the PFFC approach. Evaluate the PFFC with the participants' own experience in terms of its efficacy. 

5.2.1 High Quality Project-Based Learning

As we discussed in module one and three, the FLA leaves students more in-class time to participate in active and deep learning. Well-designed or high-quality project-based learning (PBL) has been shown to result in deeper learning in the real-world which promotes creativity, collaboration, communication and critical thinking skills. This module focuses on how to incorporate high-quality PBI into a flipped class successfully.

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. recognize the prominent role that PBI plays in students' learning process;
  2. design a flipped lesson with PBI in accordance with the five principles introduced in the module.

For Participants

What is Project-Based Instruction (PBI)/ Project-Based Learning (PBL)?

The fundamental difference between traditional learning and project-based learning is the ownership of learning. The traditional learning is teacher-centered. The teacher takes full control of students and the goal of learning for students is memorizing and regurgitating what the teacher said. However, project-based learning is student-centered. Students engage themselves in projects by applying the knowledge into real-life tasks. The following video illustrates how project-based learning works in a foreign language classroom:

Media embedded June 17, 2020

Kaplan International Languages. (2019, Jun. 11). Real English - Project-based Learning.[Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/QC0JeAXHCv8

Markham (2011) describes that "PBL integrates knowing and doing. Students learn knowledge and elements of the core curriculum, but also apply what they know to solve authentic problems and produce results that matter. PBL students take advantage of digital tools to produce high quality, collaborative products. PBL refocuses education on the student, not the curriculum—a shift mandated by the global world, which rewards intangible assets such as drive, passion, creativity, empathy, and resiliency. These cannot be taught out of a textbook, but must be activated through experience."

The Benefits of PBI

Most studies show that project-based learning can help students:

  1. Increase academic achievement
  2. Increase application and retention of information
  3. Increase creativity, collaboration, communication and critical thinking skills.

5 Principles to High-Quality PBI

PBI has to be very carefully scaffolded to optimize its’ benefits and minimize the limitations to students. There are myriad ways to approach and implement PBI, but all the high-quality PBI is perpetuated with the following 5 essential keys.  Purdue University demonstrates its successful practices in accordance with the 5 principles:

Media embedded June 17, 2020

Edutopia. (2014, June. 26). Five Keys to Rigorous Project-Based Learning [video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/hnzCGNnU_WM

The 5 Keys to rigorous PBI illustrated in the video are (edutopia, 2014):

1. Establishing Real-World Connections in Projects

Students are more engaged when learning relates directly to the world they live in. See how to extend your projects beyond the classroom walls.

Building Rigorous Projects That Are Core to Learning

2. Building Rigorous Projects That Are Core to Learning

Project-based learning doesn't mean leaving standards behind. Follow these tips to plan projects that challenge your students and align with core learning goals.

3. Structuring Collaboration for Student Success

PBL provides a unique opportunity to help students practice critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity. Learn how to optimize the environment for teamwork in your classroom.

4. Facilitating Learning in a Student-Driven Environment

When they are directly involved in planning and steering projects, students are more invested in their learning. Get ideas for empowering your students to work independently.

5. ​Embedding Assessment Throughout the Project

Assessment can be integrated seamlessly into project-based learning. Find tools for measuring student understanding from the beginning to the end of a project.

[Comment]

What's the fundamental difference between traditional learning and PBI? Have you encountered any challenges while practicing PBI? What other approaches do you know can engage students in developing their problem-solving and critical thinking skills? 

[Assignment] 

Group Collaborative Task: Work with your assigned teammates to come up with a project-based activity for the flipped class that must promote higher-order thinking skills. You need to align your class desi with the 5 keys to PBI introduced in this module. Present how you are going to integrate PBI into your flipped class. Your presentation will be evaluated with the peer-review survey.

[Supplementary materials]

1. Project-based learning in the classroom - 9 Amazing apps for PBL [video] 

2. Gold Standard PBL: Project Based Teaching Practices 

3. Gold Standard PBL: Essential Project Design Elements 

For Facilitators

The assignment is a good example of project-based learning. The development of the assignment complies with the 5 keys to high-quality PBI:

  • Real-world Connection

  • Core to Learning

  • Structured Collaboration

  • Student-Driven

  • Multifaceted Assessment

Use Forms (an app from MS Office) to develop peer-review and self-review surveys after the presentations. The participants will be given some time to revise or polish their lesson plans and move forward to the final project. 

5.2.2 Productive Failure-Based FLA

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. grasp the evolutions of FLA, such as the productive failure-based flipped classroom (PFFC)
  2. apply the PFFC model in classroom teaching, and analyze its advantages and limitations.

For Participants

What is Productive Failure-based Flipped Classroom?

New and slightly different versions of flipped classrooms have evolved over the years. "Productive failure-based FLA" is one of the examples. Kapur (2015) defines productive failure as "a learning design that affords students opportunities to generate representations and solutions to a novel problem that targets a concept they have not learned yet, followed by consolidation and knowledge assembly where they learn the targeted concept" (Song & Kapur, 2017, p. 292).

Song and Kapur (2017) conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing the "traditional flipped classroom" (TFC) pedagogical design with the "productive failure-based flipped classroom" (PFFC) pedagogical design for a 2-week curricular unit on polynomials in a Hong Kong Secondary school. The following diagram illustrates the pedagogical designs of TFC and PFFC:

Figure 5. Pedagogical designs for TFC group and PFFC group

Different from the TFC where students are provided video lectures to study at home before solving problems in class, the PFFC works the other way around. With the aid of technologies, students explored, discussed and solved problems related to the new concepts first in class even though they might come across failures, followed by consolidating the concepts and associated procedures using video clips at home. Findings show that "both classes had significant improvement in procedural knowledge. However, regarding conceptual knowledge, students in the 'productive failure' condition performed better than those in the traditional flipped classroom" (Song & Kapur, 2017). This suggests that the "productive failure-based flipped classroom" pedagogical design may be better able to improve students' problem-solving skills. 

Productive Failure Theory

Dr. Kapur describes the concept of "productive failure" in the following video:

Media embedded June 17, 2020

TEDx Talks. (2019, Dec.2). Productive Failure | Manu Kapur | TEDxLugano. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/VOKJmg34wME

Benefits of Productive Failure Theory in Teaching

  1. By first grappling with the problem, students might better recognize its deep features.
  2. Attempting to solve the problem activates the prior knowledge networks within students’ minds (often known as ‘schemas’) so that new learning fits into these networks appropriately.
  3. Students become aware of the gaps in their knowledge and may become more focused on these gaps or more motivated to close them during later teaching (Ashman, 2016).

Conclusion

Ashman(2016) states that the PFFC pedagogical design may work for certain groups of mature learners better over others, but for novice learners, fully guided instruction is superior. In addition, the extant study about PFFC still maintains certain subjects, such as math. There is no sufficient study to prove its scalability in other subjects. While the version of FLA has evolved over the last decade, the goals of increased engagement and optimized class time are still present in all reiterations.

[Comment]

What do you think about the productive failure-based flipped classroom? Do you think the PFFC can be incorporated in your language classroom? Remember you were tasked to develop a flipped class in the first week of the training? That was a problem-based / PFFC activity. What implications did you get from the practice of PFF?

[Assignment]

1. Update: Use the PFFC pedagogical design model (as shown above in figure 5) as a format to develop a lesson you are going to teach this week. Markdown your students' performance at each stage while practicing the PFFC. Evaluate the PFFC with your own experience and share your outcomes with your colleagues. 

2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' updates.

For Facilitators

This module focuses on the new version of the flipped learning approach, i.e. PFFC. This innovative pedagogical design model has been used in the module 1 assignment. It can help facilitators identify the gaps in the participants' knowledge and provide differentiated instruction. In terms of PFFC, there is completely opposite voice pertaining to its efficacy. Many variables, such as learners' motivation, state of maturity,  subjects, and technological aids can all contribute to the success/failure of PFFC. Therefore,  the participants will have to apply this pedagogical approach in their class, analyze and evaluate whether this method will work efficiently or not for their students. 

[Supplementary Material for the Facilitators]

A new test of ‘productive failure’

VI. Limitations and Challenges of FLA

Learning Objectives:

After completing this module, the participants will be able to:

  1. acknowledge the limitations of the FLA from the teachers' perspective, students' perspective, and pedagogical perspective;
  2. navigate the pitfalls to optimize students' learning process through FLA.

For Participants

LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES

Though flipped learning can engage students more in autonomous learning and help develop students' critical thinking skills, many researchers bring up their concerns about this learning approach from the following perspectives:

Challenges from the Teacher's Perspective

The pioneers of FLA Bergmann and Sams (2012) argue teachers may find challenges with this model as well as students. Increased preparation time is initially likely needed, as creating high-quality videos requires teachers to contribute significant time and effort outside of regular teaching responsibilities. Sparks (2011) points out additional funding may also be required to procure training for teachers to navigate computer technologies involved in the successful implementation of the inverted model.

Challenges from the Students' Perspective

In the practice of FLA, student engagement and accountability are critical. Strayer (2012) states some students may struggle due to their developing personal responsibility. In a self-directed, home learning environment students who are not at the developmental stage required to keep on-task with independent learning may fall rapidly behind their peers. Others argue that adopting the FLA might be appropriate for certain subjects, courses, lessons or units, but might not be necessarily suitable for every educational context (Bergmann & Sams, 2012).

Abeysekera & Dawson (2015) believe the flipped classroom model is more dependent on students’ motivation than the ‘traditional’ model. Students need to be motivated to complete out-of-class assignments, such as watching a video, exploring a website, or completing readings. Students who are not motivated are more likely to fall behind their peers when they fail to complete the assigned preparatory tasks prior to attending classes (Siegle, 2014).

Challenges from the Pedagogical Perspective

One of the benefits of the FLA is to foster students' higher-order thinking skills by engaging them to do activities in-class to promote their analyzing, evaluating and creating skills. However, Allen (2014) addresses some of the limitations of flipped learning, for example, higher-order thinking skills cannot be taught outside the classroom since abstract ideas and skills need scaffolding from an instructor. Strayer (2007) also concludes that the class activities may need to be less open-ended and more step-by-step and students should be given an opportunity to reflect on their own learning.

In a comparative study between the flipped classroom and traditional classroom, Strayer (2007) finds that students participating in his flipped classroom were less satisfied with the teaching format than students in his traditional classroom. Though the students preferred the high level of innovation and enjoyed sharing knowledge through collaborative learning in the classroom, they were less satisfied with the structure of the course (learning tasks that weren’t clearly defined). The variety of learning activities delivered in the flipped classroom contributed to a sense of unsettledness for them. They could not cope with the activities and absorb the content fully compared to their peers in the traditional classroom.

NAVIGATING THE PITFALLS

  • Ensure that students can reach you outside of the face-to-face classroom through email or a learning management system
  • Help students form afterschool study groups for better accountability and collaborative learning
  • Hold students responsible for their outside learning by grading participation and access

[Comment]

Can you flip your class through the whole course? When do you think is the most appropriate timing to incorporate flipped classroom into your instruction? and why?

[Assignment]

1. Update: What challenges have you seen while flipping your class? Please elaborate on the challenges from the perspectives of teachers and students. Any solutions to cope with the challenges?

2. Comment on at least 3 colleagues' posts.

For Facilitators

The purpose of this module is to have participants understand that there is no "one size fits all" pedagogical model in teaching and learning. The objective of this module is to realize the limitations of the FLA and find the solutions to optimize the teaching approach. 

The participants are encouraged to share their experiences and thoughts pertaining to the limitations or challenges they have encountered while flipping class during the in-class discussion hour. The group through collaborative discussion will find feasible solutions. If not, the participants will come up with a deductive conclusion when FLA works and when it does not work. 

VII. Final Project

For Participants

Through the Update I - VI, we hope you have gained a comprehensive understanding of the FLA including the supporting theories, benefits and limitations, and the framework about how to apply the FLA with the educational technology tools. For the final project, you will create a two-hour lesson plan that uses at least one educational technology tool and one pedagogical model (not limited to the ones introduced in the modules) under the FLA principle. The lesson plan will include but not limited to the following elements:

  1. the topic 
  2. the objectives
  3. the design rationale
  4. the learning activities (pre-class, during-class, post-class)
  5. the means of assessment

Final Project Check List:

  1. Theoretical grounding: Is your lesson plan backed up by the FLA and its theoretical frameworks (Constructivism/ZPD and Bloom's Taxonomy)? How do you apply the FLA to achieve the learning objective and enhance the learning process? 
  2. Application: Did you apply an educational technology tool and one pedagogical model and provide justification? Is the lesson appropriate to the CE students regarding age group, target language comprehension level, and learning goal?
  3. Clarity: Does your lesson plan clearly illustrate your design concept in all elements? Do you define each phase and use the educational technology tool in a way that reflects the FLA?

 

Attached is the final project rubric and the link for peer-review feedback.  Peer-review Form

Final Project Rubric

 

For Facilitator

For the final project, the participants will design a lesson plan including one technology tool and one pedagogical principle. The project will be posted on MS Wiki and presented on the last day. 

[Facilitator Notes]

- The projects will be reviewed by all participants based on the presentation and the post. The peer-review feedback is due two days after the training.

- Considering the different technology literacy level of each participant, facilitators can advise the participants to choose tools easy to manipulate to their capacity. Also, the project should be representing the participant's understanding of the module, not their mastery of the tool.

- Encourage constructive suggestions in the online session discussion

Post-Workshop Survey

Thank you for attending the "Meaningful and Innovative Flipped Learning Approach" training. Please complete the post-workshop self-evaluation and provide your valuable feedback about this training via the survey link: https://forms.gle/bPCH7TMRJ9x8HP5W8

References

Abeysekera L. Dawson P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336

Ashman, G. (2016, Nov. 17). A new test of ‘productive failure’. https://gregashman.wordpress.com/2016/11/17/a-new-test-of-productive-failure/

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

Bethany Petty. (2015) Nearpod Review. [Video] Retrieved Jun. 14, 2020, from: https://youtu.be/Potta_y4ZOQ

Common Sense Education. (2016, Jul. 12). What is Bloom's Digital Taxonomy? [Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/fqgTBwElPzU

Eppard, J., & Rochdi, A. (2017). A Framework for Flipped Learning. International Association for Development of the Information Society.

Edutopia. (2014, Nov. 4). The Flipped Class: Overcoming Common Hurdles [Video]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/bwvXFlLQClU

Flipped Classroom Tutorials. (2018) Interactive and more engaging lessons with Thinglink. [Video] Retrieved Jun 12, 2020 from: https://youtu.be/ZfN_A1lOxMU

Flipped Learning Network (2014). The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P™. Retrieved from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning/

Edutopia. (2014, June 15). 5 Keys to Rigorous Project-Based Learning. https://www.edutopia.org/video/5-keys-rigorous-project-based-learning

Faculty Innovation Center (UT). (n.d.). How do you flip a class? [Video]. Retrieved from https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/how-to-flip

Inozemtzeva, Kira & Kirsanova, Galina & Troufanova, Natalia & Semenova, Yekaterina. (2018). Using Thinglink Digital Posters in Teaching ESP to Business and Economics Students (A Case Study of Bauman Moscow State Technical University). 3487-3492. 10.21125/iceri.2018.1780.

Kaplan International Languages. (2019, Jun. 11). Real English - Project-based Learning.[Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/QC0JeAXHCv8

Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J. & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.

Lightle, K. (2011). More than just technology. Science Scope, 34(9), 6-9.

Markham, T. (2011). Project-Based Learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38-42.

McLeod, S. (2019). The Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html

Menon, S. A. (2019). Designing Online Materials for Blended Learning: Optimising on BookWidgets. Online Submission, 2(3), 166-174.​

Nearpod instructions. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://geiselmed.dartmouth.edu/radiology/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2019/03/nearpod.pdf

Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Grossman.

Renard, L. (2020, February 6). Choosing the best classroom technology—5 things teachers should think about. BookWidgets Blog. https://www.bookwidgets.com/blog/2020/02/choosing-the-best-classroom-technology-5-things-teachers-should-think-about

Salifu, S. (2016). Understanding Flipped Instructions and How They Work In the Real World. In Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Active Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model in the Digital Age (pp. 72-90). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9680-8.ch004

Sams, A. & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your student's learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16-20.

Seitan, W. I., Ajlouni, A. O., & Al-Shra'h, N. D. (2020). The Impact of Integrating Flipped Learning and Information and Communication Technology on the Secondary School Students' Academic Achievement and Their Attitudes towards It. International Education Studies, 13(2), 1-10.

Sneed, O. (2016). Integrating Technology with Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://teachonline.asu.edu/2016/05/integrating-technology-blooms-taxonomy/

Song, Y. & Kapur, M. (2017). How to flip the classroom - "Productive failure or traditional flipped classroom" pedagogical design? Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 292-305.

Sparks, S. (2011). Schools "flip" for lesson model promoted by Khan Academy. Education Week. 31(5): 1.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research. 15 (2): 171–193. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4

Swart, W. (2018). Overview: The Whys and How of Flipped Learning. IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2984-2.ch001

Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted classroom. Colleagues, 9 (1), p.7.

TeachHub.com. (2019, Jan. 17). Zone of Proximal Development [Video file]. Youtube. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/kTpn7LdcKZM

TEDx Talks. (2019, Dec.2). Productive Failure | Manu Kapur | TEDxLugano. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/VOKJmg34wME

Thinglink. (2020). New Tools for the Flipped School: Interactive Visual Media in Remote Learning. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.thinglink.com/articles/new-tools-for-the-flipped-school-interactive-visual-media-in-remote-learning

thomaspalmerphysics. (2013, Oct. 16). Showing the Differences between a Traditional and a Flipped Classroom [Video]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/yzMFdDT6FSA

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner,S. Scribner & E. Souberman., Eds.) (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934]).